Advertisement
INSW vs TEN
Which Stock Would AI Choose? International Seaways (INSW) vs. Tsakos Energy Navigation (TEN) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both INSW and TEN operate in the tanker shipping sector, transporting crude oil and petroleum products amid elevated spot rates in recent market activity.
- INSW reported record second-quarter 2026 results, including adjusted net income of $295 million and a historic $5.05 per share dividend, reflecting strong time charter equivalent (TCE) revenues.
- TEN continues fleet modernization with newbuilding deliveries and sales of older vessels, maintaining a contracted revenue backlog exceeding $3.5 billion.
- INSW has demonstrated higher recent earnings growth and dividend payouts compared to TEN, though both face exposure to volatile tanker rates.
- Sector sentiment remains supported by global energy transportation demand, with both companies showing low net loan-to-value ratios and solid liquidity positions.
- Relative performance highlights trade-offs in scale, dividend yield consistency, and growth initiatives between the two mid-cap energy transporters.
Introduction
International Seaways (INSW) and Tsakos Energy Navigation (TEN) represent two established players in the international tanker shipping industry. This comparison examines their business models, recent financial results, and market positioning to assist investors and traders evaluating exposure to energy transportation equities. The analysis focuses on verifiable developments over recent weeks and broader performance trends, providing context for those assessing relative value, dividend sustainability, and sector-specific risks in a dynamic commodity environment.
INSW Overview and Recent Performance
International Seaways, Inc. owns and operates a fleet of oceangoing vessels focused on crude oil and petroleum products. The company segments operations into Crude Tankers and Product Carriers, serving major oil companies and traders. In recent market activity, INSW delivered record second-quarter 2026 financial results, with shipping revenues reaching $467.3 million and adjusted net income of $295 million, driven by blended spot TCE rates averaging approximately $79,000 per day. The firm declared its largest-ever quarterly dividend of $5.05 per share, payable in September 2026, alongside ongoing fleet optimization through new LR1 vessel orders. Strong free cash flow of $261 million and liquidity near $935 million have supported shareholder returns, contributing to positive sentiment amid elevated tanker earnings.
TEN Overview and Recent Performance
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited provides seaborne transportation of crude oil, petroleum products, and liquefied natural gas (LNG) through a diversified fleet that includes VLCCs, Suezmaxes, Aframaxes, and shuttle tankers. In recent weeks, TEN advanced its fleet renewal program with additional newbuilding deliveries and the sale of two first-generation Suezmax tankers, generating over $100 million in cash proceeds. The company maintains a minimum contracted revenue backlog exceeding $3.5 billion and high fleet utilization near 98%. Earlier 2026 results showed net income growth, with management emphasizing timely orders for LNG carriers and VLCCs. Dividend declarations on preferred shares and a focus on modernizing the fleet have sustained operational stability in the current tanker rate environment.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions, including consistent trend capture, risk-adjusted returns, and alignment with sector dynamics, earn placement in this section. Available bots span varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many targeting energy and shipping equities. Users can explore detailed metrics such as win rates, drawdowns, and backtested results to identify bots matching specific risk profiles. Review the curated selection on the Trending AI Robots page for data-driven trading insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
INSW and TEN share exposure to tanker rate volatility but differ in scale and execution. INSW emphasizes aggressive dividend distribution, with recent payouts reflecting outsized earnings from spot market strength, while TEN prioritizes fleet modernization and long-term contracted revenues exceeding $3.5 billion. Growth drivers for INSW center on rapid cash generation and shareholder returns, contrasted with TEN’s focus on newbuilding deliveries and vessel sales to maintain fleet modernity. Risk factors include similar sensitivity to oil demand shifts and geopolitical events affecting shipping routes, though INSW reports lower net loan-to-value ratios in recent periods. Market sentiment favors both amid strong tanker fundamentals, yet INSW has shown sharper recent earnings momentum compared to TEN’s steadier backlog emphasis.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, dividend momentum, and positioning within elevated tanker rates, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference to INSW over TEN. Stronger quarter-over-quarter earnings growth and record payouts indicate more immediate trend alignment, while TEN offers complementary stability through its contracted backlog. Outcomes remain subject to rate fluctuations and sector dynamics.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is INSW is a Buy and TEN is a Buy.
| INSW | TEN | INSW / TEN | |
| Capitalization | 5.13B | 1.44B | 356% |
| EBITDA | 982M | 308M | 319% |
| Gain YTD | 144.758 | 123.260 | 117% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.63 | 7.81 | 85% |
| Revenue | 1.26B | 855M | 147% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 321M | - |
| Total Debt | 653M | 2.14B | 31% |
INSW | TEN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 43 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INSW's Valuation (2) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TEN (21) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to TEN’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TEN (9) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to TEN’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's SMR Rating (27) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEN (70) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEN’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TEN (36) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to TEN’s over the last 12 months.
TEN's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for INSW (80) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that TEN’s stock grew significantly faster than INSW’s over the last 12 months.
| INSW | TEN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 69% | 18 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 75% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INSW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while TEN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- INSW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- TEN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INSW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INSW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TEN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
INSW (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +4.22% price change this week, while TEN (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +9.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
INSW is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
TEN is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.12% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IAUM | 43.33 | 0.25 | +0.58% |
| iShares® Gold Trust Micro | |||
| HDMV | 38.18 | 0.17 | +0.43% |
| First Trust Hrzn MgdVolatil Dev Intl ETF | |||
| AAPR | 29.72 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Innovator Eq Dfnd Prot ETF 2 YrToApl2028 | |||
| OIA | 5.85 | -0.04 | -0.68% |
| INVESCO Municipal Income OPPORTUNITIES TRUST | |||
| FGRU | 11.43 | -1.26 | -9.92% |
| T-REX 2X Long FIGR Daily Target ETF | |||
INSW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INSW has been closely correlated with TNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INSW jumps, then TNK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSW | 100% | +1.48% | ||
| TNK - INSW | 86% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| TK - INSW | 82% Closely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| TEN - INSW | 82% Closely correlated | +7.13% | ||
| FRO - INSW | 81% Closely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| DHT - INSW | 81% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
More | ||||