It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INTU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNPS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INTU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNPS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
INTU (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.99% price change this week, while SNPS (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.81%.
INTU is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
SNPS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
INTU | SNPS | INTU / SNPS | |
Capitalization | 179B | 88B | 203% |
EBITDA | 4.37B | 1.74B | 251% |
Gain YTD | 3.553 | -4.414 | -80% |
P/E Ratio | 65.35 | 63.66 | 103% |
Revenue | 15.1B | 6.13B | 246% |
Total Cash | 1.49B | 1.27B | 117% |
Total Debt | 6.5B | 670M | 971% |
INTU | SNPS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INTU's Valuation (70) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SNPS (89). This means that INTU’s stock grew similarly to SNPS’s over the last 12 months.
SNPS's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as INTU (26). This means that SNPS’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.
SNPS's SMR Rating (42) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as INTU (52). This means that SNPS’s stock grew similarly to INTU’s over the last 12 months.
INTU's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SNPS (61). This means that INTU’s stock grew similarly to SNPS’s over the last 12 months.
INTU's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as SNPS (83). This means that INTU’s stock grew similarly to SNPS’s over the last 12 months.
INTU | SNPS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago57% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago57% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago59% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago55% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago51% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago73% | 18 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | 1 day ago53% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTU has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTU jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INTU | 100% | +1.01% | ||
CLSK - INTU | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
COIN - INTU | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.75% | ||
ADSK - INTU | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
RIOT - INTU | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.31% | ||
CRM - INTU | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SNPS | 100% | -0.24% | ||
CDNS - SNPS | 85% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
PDFS - SNPS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
MSFT - SNPS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.11% | ||
RIOT - SNPS | 53% Loosely correlated | +3.31% | ||
More |