The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
| IOO | RGEF | IOO / RGEF | |
| Gain YTD | 15.594 | 15.443 | 101% |
| Net Assets | 9.2B | 816M | 1,127% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.55 | 73% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 16.00 | 13% |
| Yield | 0.81 | 0.95 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 2 years | - |
| IOO | RGEF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 4 days ago 40% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IOO has been loosely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IOO jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that RGEF and LLY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGEF and LLY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGEF | 100% | +1.10% | ||
| LLY - RGEF | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| CMS - RGEF | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
| AXP - RGEF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| AAPL - RGEF | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.00% | ||
| RTO - RGEF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
More | ||||