IPGDF
Price
$2.72
Change
+$0.02 (+0.74%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.18B
RTNTF
Price
$73.22
Change
+$2.41 (+3.40%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
126.65B
Interact to see
Advertisement

IPGDF vs RTNTF

Header iconIPGDF vs RTNTF Comparison
Open Charts IPGDF vs RTNTFBanner chart's image
IGO
Price$2.72
Change+$0.02 (+0.74%)
Volume$2.9K
Capitalization7.18B
Rio Tinto
Price$73.22
Change+$2.41 (+3.40%)
Volume$419
Capitalization126.65B
IPGDF vs RTNTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IPGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IPGDF vs. RTNTF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IPGDF is a Hold and RTNTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (IPGDF: $2.72 vs. RTNTF: $73.22)
Brand notoriety: IPGDF and RTNTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IPGDF: 64% vs. RTNTF: 52%
Market capitalization -- IPGDF: $7.18B vs. RTNTF: $126.65B
IPGDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.18B. RTNTF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $126.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IPGDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRTNTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • IPGDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RTNTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IPGDF is a better buy in the long-term than RTNTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IPGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTNTF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IPGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RTNTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RTNTF is a better buy in the short-term than IPGDF.

Price Growth

IPGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.06% price change this week, while RTNTF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTNTF($127B) has a higher market cap than IPGDF($7.18B). RTNTF has higher P/E ratio than IPGDF: RTNTF (14.95) vs IPGDF (12.74). RTNTF YTD gains are higher at: 2.909 vs. IPGDF (-12.232). RTNTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.7B vs. IPGDF (1.26B). RTNTF has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. IPGDF (494M). IPGDF has less debt than RTNTF: IPGDF (947M) vs RTNTF (14.1B). RTNTF has higher revenues than IPGDF: RTNTF (52.4B) vs IPGDF (1.02B).
IPGDFRTNTFIPGDF / RTNTF
Capitalization7.18B127B6%
EBITDA1.26B20.7B6%
Gain YTD-12.2322.909-420%
P/E Ratio12.7414.9585%
Revenue1.02B52.4B2%
Total Cash494M10.5B5%
Total Debt947M14.1B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IPGDF vs RTNTF: Fundamental Ratings
IPGDF
RTNTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
9099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
179
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RTNTF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as IPGDF (18). This means that RTNTF’s stock grew similarly to IPGDF’s over the last 12 months.

RTNTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as IPGDF (100). This means that RTNTF’s stock grew similarly to IPGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IPGDF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as RTNTF (99). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew similarly to RTNTF’s over the last 12 months.

RTNTF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as IPGDF (62). This means that RTNTF’s stock grew similarly to IPGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IPGDF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RTNTF (79). This means that IPGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than RTNTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IPGDFRTNTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IPGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RTNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLOW32.640.48
+1.48%
Global X U.S. Cash Flow Kings 100 ETF
MID66.510.61
+0.93%
American Century Mid Cap Gr Impact ETF
AGGH20.44N/A
N/A
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
QIG44.65-0.06
-0.12%
WisdomTree US Corporate Bond
BWX23.38-0.05
-0.21%
SPDR® Blmbg Intl Trs Bd ETF

IPGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPGDF has been loosely correlated with IIDDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPGDF jumps, then IIDDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPGDF
1D Price
Change %
IPGDF100%
+0.77%
IIDDY - IPGDF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MALRY - IPGDF
32%
Poorly correlated
+7.44%
PMETF - IPGDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.84%
LYSDY - IPGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
RTNTF - IPGDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
More

RTNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTNTF and IPGDF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTNTF and IPGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTNTF
1D Price
Change %
RTNTF100%
+3.13%
IPGDF - RTNTF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
LYSDY - RTNTF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
VALE - RTNTF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
LEU - RTNTF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
FSUGY - RTNTF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More