Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IQM vs SMH
IQM vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts IQM vs SMH
IQM vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Annualized Return+101%
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IQM vs. SMH commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IQM is a StrongBuy and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 71.9B vs. IQM (87.5M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than IQM: SMH (79.685) vs IQM (38.967). IQM was incepted earlier than SMH: IQM (6 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IQM (0.50). IQM has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| IQM | SMH | IQM / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 38.967 | 79.685 | 49% |
| Net Assets | 87.5M | 71.9B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.35 | 143% |
| Turnover | 44.12 | 12.00 | 368% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.18 | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IQM | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Annualized Return+101%
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IQM has been loosely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IQM jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQM | 100% | +3.92% | ||
| ETN - IQM | 36% Loosely correlated | +4.00% | ||
| LRCX - IQM | 35% Loosely correlated | +6.03% | ||
| TER - IQM | 34% Loosely correlated | +7.24% | ||
| KLAC - IQM | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| AMAT - IQM | 33% Loosely correlated | +3.27% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +4.38% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +6.03% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +3.27% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | +4.12% | ||
More | ||||