ISRG
Price
$337.47
Change
+$5.45 (+1.64%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
117.3B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NTRA
Price
$261.99
Change
-$2.70 (-1.02%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
37.91B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ISRG vs NTRA

ISRG vs NTRA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) vs. Natera (NTRA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Intuitive Surgical (ISRG) dominates robotic-assisted surgery with over 11,000 da Vinci systems installed worldwide and generated full-year 2025 revenue of approximately $10 billion, underpinned by 18% procedure growth.
  • Natera (NTRA) is a high-growth leader in cell-free DNA testing, with 2025 revenue surging roughly 36% to $2.3 billion, driven by record demand for its Signatera molecular residual disease (MRD) oncology test.
  • ISRG is firmly profitable with strong free cash flow and a $9 billion cash reserve, while NTRA continues to invest aggressively and posted a full-year net loss despite turning profitable in its most recent quarter.
  • Both companies operate in the healthcare sector but serve fundamentally different markets: ISRG in robotic surgical systems and NTRA in precision diagnostics and genetic testing.
  • ISRG faces margin pressure from tariffs and intensifying competition in China, while NTRA navigates a complex reimbursement landscape and significant operating expense growth.
  • Risk-reward profiles diverge sharply: ISRG offers proven profitability at a premium valuation multiple, whereas NTRA offers faster revenue growth with a path toward sustained profitability still being established.

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving healthcare technology landscape, ISRG and NTRA represent two distinct but compelling investment narratives. Intuitive Surgical, the pioneer of robotic-assisted surgery, has built a durable competitive moat around its da Vinci platform over more than two decades. Natera, by contrast, has emerged as a high-growth force in precision medicine, leveraging its cell-free DNA technology across oncology, women's health, and organ health. This stock comparison examines how these two healthcare innovators stack up across business models, recent momentum, growth drivers, and risk factors — offering traders and investors a clear, data-driven framework for evaluating relative positioning in the current market environment.

ISRG Overview and Recent Performance

Intuitive Surgical is the undisputed global leader in robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery. The company's flagship da Vinci surgical system — now in its fifth generation (da Vinci 5, or dV5) — is used across general surgery, gynecology, urology, colorectal, and thoracic procedures. Its Ion endoluminal system extends robotic precision into lung biopsy and early cancer diagnosis. In recent quarters, ISRG delivered robust operational performance. For the full year 2025, worldwide da Vinci procedure volume increased approximately 18%, with international markets growing 23%, outpacing 15% growth in the United States. The accelerating adoption of dV5, which reached 870 system placements in 2025, has been a key catalyst, driving higher system utilization and a growing upgrade cycle as hospitals transition from older Xi units.

Financially, ISRG reported fourth-quarter 2025 revenue of $2.87 billion, a 19% year-over-year increase, while full-year revenue reached roughly $10 billion. The company remains highly profitable, with a non-GAAP operating margin near 38% and $9.03 billion in cash and investments on its balance sheet. However, recent market activity reflects investor caution around several headwinds: tariffs on components and finished goods are compressing gross margins, which management guided to a 67%–68% range for 2026, down from pre-dV5 levels. Competition in China — including pricing pressure and local rivals — remains a persistent concern, while GLP-1 weight-loss drugs continue to weigh on bariatric surgery volumes, albeit from a small base.

NTRA Overview and Recent Performance

Natera is a global leader in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing and precision medicine, with an expanding footprint across three core verticals: oncology, women's health, and organ health. Its flagship Signatera test — a personalized, tumor-informed molecular residual disease (MRD) assay — has become a transformative tool for monitoring cancer recurrence across multiple tumor types. In women's health, its Panorama non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) and Horizon carrier screening products maintain strong market positions, while its organ health franchise addresses transplant rejection monitoring.

NTRA's recent financial trajectory has been marked by accelerating revenue growth and improving unit economics. Full-year 2025 revenue reached $2.3 billion, a 35.9% increase over 2024, while Q4 2025 revenue jumped 39.8% year-over-year to $665.5 million. Oncology testing volume surged approximately 52% for the full year, with Signatera clinical MRD tests surpassing 769,000 units. Gross margins expanded meaningfully — from 60.3% in 2024 to 64.7% in 2025 — signaling growing operating leverage as test volumes scale. Notably, Natera delivered positive EPS of $0.35 in Q4, its first profitable quarter. However, the full-year picture remains one of investment: the company reported a net loss of $208.2 million, as selling, general and administrative expenses and R&D spending grew sharply to support commercial expansion and pipeline development.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking an analytical edge in today's dynamic markets, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate complex stock comparisons like the one between ISRG and NTRA. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that actively trade thousands of different tickers, but only a select group — those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions — earns a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots span diverse trading styles and strategies, from momentum-based swing trading to longer-term trend following, with performance metrics and statistical track records that range from double-digit annualized returns to high-frequency Sharpe ratios above 2.0. Each bot is purpose-built for a specific set of tickers, risk profiles, and timeframes, allowing traders to find automated strategies that match their individual approach. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to discover which AI-driven strategies are currently gaining traction.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Although both ISRG and NTRA operate at the intersection of technology and healthcare, their business models, growth profiles, and risk exposures differ substantially.

Business Model and Revenue Mix: ISRG generates revenue through a "razor-and-blade" model — selling capital equipment (da Vinci and Ion systems) and earning recurring revenue from instruments, accessories, and service contracts tied to procedure volume. This creates a highly visible, recurring revenue stream that grows with the installed base. NTRA follows a test-volume-driven diagnostic model, where revenue scales with the number of tests processed and reported, plus average selling price improvements driven by payer coverage expansion. Both models benefit from rising utilization, but ISRG's recurring revenue from its installed base of over 11,000 systems provides a more established and predictable foundation.

Growth Dynamics: NTRA is growing revenue significantly faster — approximately 36% in 2025 versus ISRG's roughly 19%. NTRA's oncology segment, led by Signatera, is expanding at over 50% annually and represents a large addressable market still in the early innings of clinical adoption. ISRG's growth, while more moderate, is underpinned by global surgical robotics adoption across multiple specialties and geographies, with dV5 acting as a near-term catalyst for system upgrades and higher utilization.

Profitability and Financial Strength: This is where the two diverge most sharply. ISRG generates substantial GAAP net income — $795 million in Q4 2025 alone — and holds $9 billion in cash with negligible debt. NTRA, despite its Q4 2025 profit, operated at a full-year net loss of $208 million and carries ongoing high investment in R&D and commercial infrastructure. ISRG's financial fortress gives it far greater resilience during market downturns.

Risk Factors: ISRG's primary risks include tariff-related margin compression, intensifying competition in China, and slower U.S. procedure growth tied to macroeconomic pressures on patient volumes. NTRA faces reimbursement uncertainty, regulatory scrutiny, fierce competition from peers such as Guardant Health, and the challenge of converting accelerating revenue into sustainable GAAP profitability. Recent insider selling at NTRA — totaling over $85 million in a three-month window — has also drawn investor attention.

Market Sentiment and Valuation: ISRG trades at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio in the low 50s, a premium to the broader medical device industry but supported by its durable competitive position. NTRA trades at a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio in the low-to-mid teens, reflecting investor optimism around its growth trajectory but also embedding execution risk since the company has yet to deliver consistent full-year profitability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, financial stability, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely favor ISRG in the current environment — not because it offers the highest growth rate, but because it presents a more balanced risk-reward profile. ISRG's established profitability, robust cash reserves, broad-based procedure growth, and strong product cycle with dV5 provide a foundation of trend consistency that algorithmic models tend to reward. NTRA's explosive revenue growth and improving gross margins are compelling, but the combination of full-year operating losses, heavy insider selling, and a still-unproven path to sustained GAAP profitability introduces a higher degree of uncertainty. That said, traders with higher risk tolerance and a focus on growth momentum may find NTRA's trajectory more aligned with their objectives. The relative attractiveness of each stock ultimately depends on an individual investor's time horizon and risk appetite.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ISRG vs. NTRA commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISRG is a Buy and NTRA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (ISRG: $332.02 vs. NTRA: $264.69)
Brand notoriety: ISRG: Notable vs. NTRA: Not notable
ISRG represents the Pharmaceuticals: Other, while NTRA is part of the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ISRG: 114% vs. NTRA: 22%
Market capitalization -- ISRG: $117.3B vs. NTRA: $37.91B
ISRG [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $117.3B. NTRA’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $37.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $117.3B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $7.36B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $17.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ISRG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTRA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ISRG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NTRA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTRA is a better buy in the long-term than ISRG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ISRG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTRA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ISRG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NTRA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ISRG and NTRA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ISRG (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -17.48% price change this week, while NTRA (@Medical Specialties) price change was -1.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -3.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.37%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

ISRG is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

NTRA is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-3.33% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

@Medical Specialties (-1.41% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ISRG($117B) has a higher market cap than NTRA($37.9B). NTRA YTD gains are higher at: 15.540 vs. ISRG (-41.377). ISRG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.95B vs. NTRA (-227.7M). ISRG has more cash in the bank: 4.52B vs. NTRA (1.09B). ISRG has less debt than NTRA: ISRG (87M) vs NTRA (240M). ISRG has higher revenues than NTRA: ISRG (10.6B) vs NTRA (2.5B).
ISRGNTRAISRG / NTRA
Capitalization117B37.9B309%
EBITDA3.95B-227.7M-1,735%
Gain YTD-41.37715.540-266%
P/E Ratio38.08N/A-
Revenue10.6B2.5B424%
Total Cash4.52B1.09B415%
Total Debt87M240M36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ISRG vs NTRA: Fundamental Ratings
ISRG
NTRA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6493
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9134
SMR RATING
1..100
5196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NTRA's Valuation (56) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as ISRG (75) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that NTRA’s stock grew similarly to ISRG’s over the last 12 months.

NTRA's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ISRG (91) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that NTRA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ISRG’s over the last 12 months.

ISRG's SMR Rating (51) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTRA (96) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ISRG’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTRA’s over the last 12 months.

NTRA's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as ISRG (65) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that NTRA’s stock grew similarly to ISRG’s over the last 12 months.

ISRG's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as NTRA (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ISRG’s stock grew similarly to NTRA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ISRGNTRA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ISRG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NTRA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIRI2.670.05
+1.91%
Air Industries Group
FLEX127.940.94
+0.74%
Flex Ltd
FJET3.71-0.01
-0.27%
Starfighters Space Inc.
CBT89.11-0.47
-0.52%
Cabot Corp
GDRX2.87-0.06
-2.05%
GoodRx Holdings