Investors seeking growth equity exposure frequently compare the iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ). These ETFs do not compete directly but represent alternative strategies within the large-cap growth segment. IUSG provides diversified access to S&P 900 growth constituents, while QQQ delivers concentrated exposure to Nasdaq-100 leaders. The comparison helps investors evaluate trade-offs between cost, diversification, sector emphasis, and positioning amid ongoing technology-driven market dynamics and shifting interest-rate expectations.
The iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the S&P 900 Growth Index. This index selects large- and mid-capitalization U.S. companies based on growth metrics such as earnings and revenue expansion. The ETF holds approximately 393 securities and maintains full replication of the index. Top holdings typically include leading technology and growth names such as NVIDIA, Microsoft, Apple, Alphabet, and Broadcom. Sector allocations feature roughly 50% in information technology, 14-15% in communication services, 9% in financials, and smaller weights in consumer discretionary and industrials. The expense ratio stands at 0.04%. As an open-end fund structure, IUSG offers high liquidity and transparent daily holdings disclosure.
The Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) is a passively managed unit investment trust that tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index. The index comprises the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange, selected by market capitalization. The ETF holds 103 positions, reflecting the index plus minor cash or adjustments. Top holdings center on technology leaders such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Broadcom. Sector allocations are heavily skewed, with over 65% in technology, approximately 17% in consumer discretionary, and smaller allocations to health care and industrials. The expense ratio is 0.18%. QQQ employs a modified market-capitalization weighting methodology with quarterly rebalancing and maintains high trading volume and liquidity.
Both ETFs operate within the U.S. large-cap growth equity universe, dominated by technology and innovation themes. Capital flows continue to favor companies demonstrating strong earnings growth, artificial intelligence adoption, and digital transformation. Macroeconomic drivers include expectations around monetary policy, inflation trends, and corporate capital expenditure cycles. Regulatory developments in antitrust and data privacy primarily affect technology holdings common to both funds. Sector risks encompass valuation compression in high-growth names, supply-chain disruptions, and competition for talent. Broader equity market rotations between growth and value styles influence relative demand for these strategies during different economic regimes.
In recent market cycles, QQQ has exhibited higher sensitivity to technology sector performance due to its concentrated Nasdaq-100 exposure. Periods of strong earnings growth among mega-cap technology companies have supported outperformance relative to broader benchmarks. IUSG, with its wider sector representation and inclusion of mid-cap growth names, has shown comparatively lower volatility and more balanced participation across financials and consumer sectors. Relative positioning depends on the prevailing environment: technology-led rallies tend to favor QQQ, while rotations into diversified growth equities benefit IUSG. Both ETFs have delivered competitive long-term returns aligned with their respective indices, with cost differences amplifying compounding effects over extended holding periods.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors comparing growth ETFs may use the tool to evaluate additional candidates aligned with their risk and return objectives.
Based on structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to the iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 393 holdings, and balanced sector exposure provide a more resilient profile across varying market regimes. While the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) offers compelling sector momentum within technology, its higher cost and concentration introduce greater variability. The assessment remains probabilistic and depends on evolving sector trends and investor-specific risk tolerance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| IUSG | QQQ | IUSG / QQQ | |
| Gain YTD | 13.173 | 16.411 | 80% |
| Net Assets | 33.1B | 485B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.18 | 22% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 7.98 | 276% |
| Yield | 0.50 | 0.44 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 27 years | - |
| IUSG | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 84% | 12 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XPH | 72.80 | 0.51 | +0.71% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&P® PhrmctlsETF | |||
| OMFL | 70.70 | 0.34 | +0.48% |
| Invesco Russell 1000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF | |||
| DCMT | 35.80 | 0.13 | +0.35% |
| DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF | |||
| IGGY | 29.87 | N/A | N/A |
| AB International Growth ETF | |||
| KCSH | 25.09 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Kraneshares Sust Ultra Shrt Dur Idx ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IUSG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IUSG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IUSG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUSG | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| CDNS - IUSG | 78% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| SNPS - IUSG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| LRCX - IUSG | 76% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| KLAC - IUSG | 75% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| AMAT - IUSG | 74% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||