IUSG vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IUSG is a Buy and SNPS is a StrongBuy.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IUSG | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GXC | 79.68 | 1.38 | +1.76% |
| SPDR® S&P China ETF | |||
| GSFP | 32.81 | 0.05 | +0.16% |
| Goldman Sachs Future Planet Equity ETF | |||
| DIHP | 26.94 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Dimensional International High Pbly ETF | |||
| HGER | 22.51 | -0.07 | -0.32% |
| Harbor Commodity All-Weather StrategyETF | |||
| SSG | 5.67 | -0.28 | -4.71% |
| ProShares UltraShort Semiconductors | |||
IUSG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IUSG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IUSG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IUSG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUSG | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| CDNS - IUSG | 78% Closely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| SNPS - IUSG | 78% Closely correlated | -3.13% | ||
| LRCX - IUSG | 76% Closely correlated | -2.91% | ||
| KLAC - IUSG | 75% Closely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| AMAT - IUSG | 74% Closely correlated | -3.37% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -3.13% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 86% Closely correlated | -2.42% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| INTU - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| CLSK - SNPS | 55% Loosely correlated | +5.43% | ||
More | ||||