IUSG vs SNPS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IUSG is a Hold and SNPS is a StrongBuy.
SNPS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IUSG | SNPS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 52% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IBDS | 24.08 | 0.04 | +0.17% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corp ETF | |||
| PCK | 5.33 | -0.02 | -0.37% |
| PIMCO CALIFORNIA Municipal Income FUND II | |||
| QQQJ | 27.16 | -0.43 | -1.56% |
| Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | |||
| ECNS | 25.64 | -0.47 | -1.80% |
| iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF | |||
| TYLG | 28.42 | -1.05 | -3.56% |
| Global X Information Tch Cvd Cll&Gr ETF | |||
IUSG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IUSG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IUSG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IUSG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IUSG | 100% | -2.67% | ||
| CDNS - IUSG | 78% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| SNPS - IUSG | 78% Closely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| LRCX - IUSG | 76% Closely correlated | -4.82% | ||
| KLAC - IUSG | 75% Closely correlated | -5.03% | ||
| AMAT - IUSG | 74% Closely correlated | -4.99% | ||
More | ||||
SNPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPS has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPS jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNPS | 100% | -2.35% | ||
| CDNS - SNPS | 88% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| ANSS - SNPS | 84% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| S - SNPS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.55% | ||
| PDFS - SNPS | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| MSFT - SNPS | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.66% | ||
More | ||||