IVP
Price
$0.94
Change
+$0.05 (+5.62%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.42M
LIND
Price
$14.84
Change
+$1.01 (+7.30%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
813.07M
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

IVP vs LIND

Header iconIVP vs LIND Comparison
Open Charts IVP vs LINDBanner chart's image
Inspire Veterinary Partners
Price$0.94
Change+$0.05 (+5.62%)
Volume$168.36K
Capitalization3.42M
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings
Price$14.84
Change+$1.01 (+7.30%)
Volume$757.93K
Capitalization813.07M
IVP vs LIND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IVP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
IVP vs. LIND commentary
Aug 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVP is a StrongBuy and LIND is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 25, 2025
Stock price -- (IVP: $0.94 vs. LIND: $14.84)
Brand notoriety: IVP and LIND are both not notable
IVP represents the Personnel Services, while LIND is part of the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IVP: 11% vs. LIND: 245%
Market capitalization -- IVP: $3.42M vs. LIND: $813.07M
IVP [@Personnel Services] is valued at $3.42M. LIND’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $813.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $28.1B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $185.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.85B. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IVP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLIND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • IVP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIND is a better buy in the long-term than IVP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IVP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIND’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IVP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LIND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVP is a better buy in the short-term than LIND.

Price Growth

IVP (@Personnel Services) experienced а -9.52% price change this week, while LIND (@Consumer Sundries) price change was +9.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +173.58%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIND is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (+0.94% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

@Consumer Sundries (+2.77% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIND($813M) has a higher market cap than IVP($3.43M). LIND YTD gains are higher at: 25.126 vs. IVP (-80.345). LIND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 96.1M vs. IVP (-9.15M). LIND has more cash in the bank: 201M vs. IVP (159K). IVP has less debt than LIND: IVP (17.5M) vs LIND (628M). LIND has higher revenues than IVP: LIND (702M) vs IVP (15.3M).
IVPLINDIVP / LIND
Capitalization3.43M813M0%
EBITDA-9.15M96.1M-10%
Gain YTD-80.34525.126-320%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue15.3M702M2%
Total Cash159K201M0%
Total Debt17.5M628M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIND: Fundamental Ratings
LIND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
16

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IVPLIND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IVP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYEIX256.587.26
+2.91%
Rydex Energy Inv
SBMAX36.430.71
+1.99%
ClearBridge Mid Cap A
ABEYX20.590.35
+1.73%
American Beacon International Eq Y
TIEWX16.440.27
+1.67%
Nuveen International Eq W
ADGAX25.720.31
+1.22%
AB Core Opportunities A

IVP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IVP and ISPO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IVP and ISPO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVP
1D Price
Change %
IVP100%
+5.23%
ISPO - IVP
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
ABNB - IVP
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
MED - IVP
13%
Poorly correlated
+5.31%
LIND - IVP
12%
Poorly correlated
+7.30%
RCL - IVP
12%
Poorly correlated
+6.04%
More

LIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIND
1D Price
Change %
LIND100%
+7.30%
CCL - LIND
59%
Loosely correlated
+6.94%
CUK - LIND
59%
Loosely correlated
+6.30%
NCLH - LIND
58%
Loosely correlated
+7.23%
RCL - LIND
56%
Loosely correlated
+6.04%
TNL - LIND
51%
Loosely correlated
+5.45%
More