LIND
Price
$34.11
Change
+$0.02 (+0.06%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.24B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VIK
Price
$108.26
Change
+$0.74 (+0.69%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
48.3B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LIND vs VIK

LIND vs VIK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Lindblad Expeditions Holdings (LIND) vs. Viking Holdings (VIK) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Lindblad Expeditions Holdings (LIND) is a niche expedition cruise operator with approximately $771 million in annual revenue, while Viking Holdings (VIK) is a global cruise giant generating over $6.5 billion.
  • Both companies posted strong revenue growth and record Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) in fiscal 2025, but Viking delivered substantial net profitability while Lindblad continued to report net losses.
  • Viking's balance sheet is significantly stronger, with net leverage improving to just 1.1x and $3.8 billion in cash, compared to Lindblad's $675 million debt load and negative equity position.
  • Both stocks have delivered impressive share-price gains over the past year, with Lindblad benefitting from a turnaround narrative and Viking riding consistent operational execution.
  • Investors face a contrast between a smaller, higher-growth-potential turnaround story and an established, profitable industry leader with greater financial stability.
  • The cruise and expedition travel sector continues to experience robust post-pandemic demand, benefitting both companies but at different scales and margin profiles.

Introduction

Comparing LIND and VIK offers investors a compelling look at two very different participants in the cruise and expedition travel industry. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings operates a specialized fleet of small expedition vessels focused on adventure travel in remote destinations, while Viking Holdings runs one of the world's largest fleets of river and ocean cruise ships serving a broad premium demographic. This stock comparison is relevant for investors evaluating exposure to the travel and leisure sector, particularly those weighing a niche, high-growth turnaround play against a well-capitalized, consistently profitable industry leader. Understanding the contrasting scale, profitability, and risk profiles of these two companies can help clarify what type of travel-sector investment aligns with different portfolio strategies.

LIND Overview and Recent Performance

LIND, headquartered in New York, is a global provider of expedition cruises and adventure travel experiences. The company operates intimate, small-scale ships that carry guests to destinations such as the Galápagos Islands, Antarctica, and the Arctic, with a strong brand association through its long-standing partnership with National Geographic. In its most recently reported full year (fiscal 2025), Lindblad generated total tour revenues of $771 million, up 20% year-over-year, and delivered record Adjusted EBITDA of $126.2 million, a 38% increase. Occupancy improved sharply to 88% from 78% the prior year, and net yield per available guest night rose 14% to $1,335, reflecting stronger pricing power and demand recovery.

Despite these operational improvements, Lindblad continues to report net losses — a net loss of $34.6 million in fiscal 2025 — weighed down by $23.5 million in debt extinguishment costs, higher depreciation, and royalty expenses tied to its National Geographic agreement. The company refinanced its long-term debt with $675 million in 7.00% senior secured notes maturing in 2030, reducing its blended borrowing rate. S&P Global upgraded Lindblad's corporate credit rating during the period, citing strong operating performance. In February 2026, all outstanding preferred stock was converted into common shares, simplifying the capital structure. The stock has posted substantial gains over the past year, reflecting investor confidence in the turnaround trajectory, though the company's negative equity position and ongoing net losses remain key risk factors to monitor.

VIK Overview and Recent Performance

VIK, domiciled in Bermuda with operational headquarters in Los Angeles, is a premier cruise operator with a fleet exceeding 100 vessels spanning river, ocean, and expedition categories. The company targets affluent, culturally curious travelers and has built a reputation for destination-focused itineraries across all seven continents. In fiscal 2025, Viking reported total revenue of $6.5 billion, a 21.9% increase over the prior year, and Adjusted EBITDA of $1.87 billion, up 38.8%. Net income reached $1.15 billion, with diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $2.57 and Adjusted EPS of $2.61. Return on invested capital (ROIC) stood at an impressive 45.8%.

Viking's balance sheet strengthened considerably through the year. Net leverage improved from 2.4x to 1.1x, and the company held $3.8 billion in cash and equivalents against scheduled 2026 principal payments of $396.8 million. Occupancy rates remained consistently strong at 95% or above, and advance bookings signaled sustained demand — as of early 2026, 86% of core product capacity for the 2026 season was already sold, with advance bookings per passenger cruise day up 6% year-over-year. The company also upsized its revolving credit facility to $1 billion and received a credit rating upgrade from Moody's. Viking's stock has delivered robust returns since its 2024 initial public offering (IPO), underpinned by strong profitability, operational momentum, and a loyal repeat-guest base.

Trending AI Robots

For traders and investors looking to augment their decision-making with technology, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate dynamic market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots covering thousands of tickers, but only the strongest performers make it into the Trending AI Robots section — a real-time showcase of the bots best aligned with current market environments. These bots span a wide range of trading styles, from short-term swing trading to longer-duration trend-following strategies, and each bot comes with its own trackable performance statistics including win rates, average trade duration, and historical return metrics. Whether focused on individual stocks or diversified baskets of tickers, these automated systems provide data-driven signals without emotional bias. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which strategies are currently leading the market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most immediate contrast between LIND and VIK is scale. Viking generates roughly 8.4 times the revenue of Lindblad and is solidly profitable on a net income basis, while Lindblad continues to operate at a net loss. Viking's occupancy rates of 95% or above outpace Lindblad's 88%, and Viking's net yield metrics reflect stronger pricing power across a much larger and more diversified fleet.

From a balance-sheet perspective, the contrast is equally stark. Viking's net leverage of 1.1x and $3.8 billion cash position provide substantial financial flexibility, whereas Lindblad carries $675 million in debt against a negative equity position and must carefully manage cash flow to service obligations. Viking's advance booking data — 86% of 2026 capacity already sold — offers exceptional forward revenue visibility, while Lindblad's smaller booking window and more weather-dependent expedition itineraries introduce greater seasonal variability.

On growth drivers, Lindblad's smaller base and expanding land-experiences segment offer the potential for outsized percentage growth if execution remains strong. Viking's growth is more measured and capital-intensive, driven by steady fleet expansion — 10 river ships and 2 ocean ships expected in 2026. In terms of market sentiment, both stocks have benefited from the broader travel demand recovery, but Viking's consistent profitability and stronger financial position may appeal to risk-conscious investors, while Lindblad attracts those willing to accept higher risk in exchange for a potential turnaround multiplier.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable financial metrics and trend signals, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor VIK in the current environment. The rationale rests on several quantifiable factors: Viking's consistent net profitability versus Lindblad's ongoing net losses, a substantially stronger balance sheet with low leverage and high liquidity, superior occupancy rates that indicate pricing power, and highly visible forward revenue through advance bookings. Viking's return on invested capital of 45.8% suggests efficient deployment of capital, while its net leverage of just 1.1x provides resilience against macroeconomic headwinds. That said, LIND may appeal to momentum-oriented strategies given its recent operational improvements and the potential for continued margin expansion if occupancy and pricing trends persist. The AI verdict is probabilistic, not absolute — different bot strategies with varying time horizons and risk tolerances may evaluate the trade-off between Viking's stability and Lindblad's turnaround potential differently.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
LIND vs. VIK commentary
Aug 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIND is a Buy and VIK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 06, 2026
Stock price -- (LIND: $34.11 vs. VIK: $108.26)
Brand notoriety: LIND and VIK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LIND: 67% vs. VIK: 81%
Market capitalization -- LIND: $2.24B vs. VIK: $48.3B
LIND [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $2.24B. VIK’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $48.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $155.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $28.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LIND’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVIK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LIND’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VIK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIND is a better buy in the long-term than VIK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LIND’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VIK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LIND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VIK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VIK is a better buy in the short-term than LIND.

Price Growth

LIND (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +14.66% price change this week, while VIK (@Consumer Sundries) price change was +5.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

LIND is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

VIK is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+2.87% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIK($48.3B) has a higher market cap than LIND($2.24B). LIND YTD gains are higher at: 136.546 vs. VIK (51.603). VIK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.84B vs. LIND (95M). VIK has more cash in the bank: 4.05B vs. LIND (275M). LIND has less debt than VIK: LIND (665M) vs VIK (5.83B). VIK has higher revenues than LIND: VIK (6.66B) vs LIND (799M).
LINDVIKLIND / VIK
Capitalization2.24B48.3B5%
EBITDA95M1.84B5%
Gain YTD136.54651.603265%
P/E RatioN/A40.25-
Revenue799M6.66B12%
Total Cash275M4.05B7%
Total Debt665M5.83B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LIND: Fundamental Ratings
LIND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
46
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
39

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LINDVIK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LIND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VIK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFGX52.580.04
+0.08%
Dimensional International Cr Fxd Inc ETF
ACLO50.350.01
+0.01%
TCW AAA CLO ETF
RLTY15.82-0.02
-0.13%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities and Income Fund
SFYF61.68-0.43
-0.70%
SoFi Social 50 ETF
QQA56.21-0.40
-0.71%
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF

LIND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with VIK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then VIK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIND
1D Price
Change %
LIND100%
+0.06%
VIK - LIND
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
NCLH - LIND
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
TNL - LIND
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
PRSU - LIND
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.89%
ABNB - LIND
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
More

VIK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIK has been closely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VIK jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VIK
1D Price
Change %
VIK100%
+0.69%
CCL - VIK
77%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
RCL - VIK
70%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
NCLH - VIK
66%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
LIND - VIK
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
TNL - VIK
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
More