Advertisement
LIND vs VIK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LIND is a Hold and VIK is a Hold.
| LIND | VIK | LIND / VIK | |
| Capitalization | 1.81B | 37.6B | 5% |
| EBITDA | 105M | 2.01B | 5% |
| Gain YTD | 90.985 | 17.841 | 510% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.83 | 27.96 | 85% |
| Revenue | 831M | 6.97B | 12% |
| Total Cash | 319M | 3.82B | 8% |
| Total Debt | 666M | 6.19B | 11% |
LIND | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 37 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LIND | VIK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 64% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIND’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while VIK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LIND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- VIK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LIND’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VIK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LIND’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- VIK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LIND (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +7.28% price change this week, while VIK (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -1.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
LIND is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
VIK is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Consumer Sundries (-0.39% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
Advertisement
LIND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with VIK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then VIK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIND | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| VIK - LIND | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| NCLH - LIND | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| TNL - LIND | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| PRSU - LIND | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| BFAM - LIND | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
More | ||||
VIK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIK has been closely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VIK jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIK | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| CCL - VIK | 74% Closely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| RCL - VIK | 67% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| NCLH - VIK | 66% Closely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| LIND - VIK | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| TNL - VIK | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
More | ||||