IVW
Price
$138.83
Change
+$0.46 (+0.33%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
76.11B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XOVR
Price
$20.35
Change
+$0.35 (+1.75%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
1.88B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IVW vs XOVR

IVW vs XOVR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) vs. ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR)

Key Takeaways

  • IVW provides broad passive exposure to large-cap U.S. growth stocks via the S&P 500 Growth Index, while XOVR employs an active crossover strategy blending public equities with limited private-company holdings.
  • IVW maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.18% compared with XOVR’s 0.75% management fee, reflecting differences in passive indexing versus active research and private-asset access.
  • IVW holds approximately 149 securities with heavy concentration in Information Technology (over 52%), whereas XOVR concentrates in roughly 32 holdings across public innovators and up to 15% in private assets such as SpaceX and Kalshi.
  • Sector allocations differ meaningfully: IVW emphasizes Information Technology and Communication Services, while XOVR shows elevated weights in Communication Services and Information Technology alongside private-equity exposure.
  • IVW offers high liquidity and daily transparency typical of large passive ETFs; XOVR provides daily liquidity but incorporates illiquid private holdings subject to valuation and liquidity constraints.
  • Both target growth-oriented investors, yet IVW suits broad market-cap growth exposure while XOVR appeals to those seeking venture-style private-public crossover opportunities within an exchange-traded structure.

Introduction

Investors evaluating growth-oriented equity exposure often compare established passive vehicles with innovative thematic strategies. The iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) both target large-cap growth characteristics but employ fundamentally different approaches. IVW delivers systematic exposure to the growth segment of the S&P 500, while XOVR integrates public equities with selective private-company investments. These ETFs therefore serve distinct roles within a growth allocation, offering investors a choice between index-based efficiency and active crossover innovation.

iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) Overview

The iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) seeks to track the S&P 500 Growth Index, providing exposure to large-cap U.S. companies exhibiting strong growth characteristics. The fund holds approximately 149 securities and maintains a passive structure with quarterly rebalancing aligned to index methodology. Top holdings typically include major technology leaders such as NVIDIA, Microsoft, and Apple. Sector allocations are dominated by Information Technology (52.37%), followed by Communication Services (14.86%), Financials (8.97%), and Consumer Discretionary (8.44%). IVW carries an expense ratio of 0.18% and benefits from high liquidity as one of the larger exchange-traded products in its category.

ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) Overview

The ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) pursues long-term capital appreciation through a hybrid strategy that combines public equities selected via proprietary Entrepreneur Factor research with a capped allocation to private companies. The fund typically holds around 32 positions and incorporates up to 15% in illiquid private assets accessed through special-purpose vehicles. Representative private holdings have included SpaceX, Kalshi, and Anduril. Sector weights emphasize Communication Services (33.66%) and Information Technology (30.57%), with additional exposure to Health Care and Financials. XOVR applies a 0.75% management fee and relaunched in its current crossover format in 2024.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The large-cap growth segment continues to be shaped by advances in artificial intelligence, digital transformation, and innovation-driven business models. Capital flows have favored technology and communication-services companies, while interest-rate expectations and regulatory scrutiny around big-tech platforms remain key variables. Private-equity access within public vehicles has gained attention as issuers seek to democratize exposure to late-stage private companies. Both ETFs operate within this environment, with IVW reflecting broad market leadership in public growth equities and XOVR adding a distinct private-market dimension subject to its own liquidity and valuation considerations.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, IVW has delivered returns closely aligned with the performance of leading large-cap growth constituents, benefiting from sector momentum in technology and communication services. XOVR’s positioning incorporates both public growth names and private holdings, introducing potential volatility from private-asset valuations and limited rebalancing flexibility. In periods of strong public-market growth, IVW’s diversified index approach has historically provided more consistent participation, whereas XOVR’s active crossover mandate may exhibit differentiated behavior during rotations favoring private-market themes or specific venture-backed companies.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore current opportunities across equities and ETFs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural efficiency, lower costs, broader diversification, and consistent liquidity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorability to IVW for most growth-oriented allocations. XOVR offers unique private-public crossover characteristics that may appeal to investors seeking differentiated exposure, yet its higher expense ratio and private-asset complexities introduce additional risk considerations relative to the established passive benchmark approach of IVW.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IVW vs. XOVR commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IVW is a Hold and XOVR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVW has more net assets: 76.1B vs. XOVR (1.88B). IVW has a higher annual dividend yield than XOVR: IVW (12.737) vs XOVR (1.043). IVW was incepted earlier than XOVR: IVW (26 years) vs XOVR (9 years). IVW (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than XOVR (0.75). XOVR has a higher turnover IVW (22.00) vs IVW (22.00).
IVWXOVRIVW / XOVR
Gain YTD12.7371.0431,222%
Net Assets76.1B1.88B4,039%
Total Expense Ratio0.180.7524%
Turnover22.0066.0033%
Yield0.370.00-
Fund Existence26 years9 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IVWXOVR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IVW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XOVR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMCL16.940.63
+3.86%
GraniteShares 2x Long SMCI Daily ETF
FESM47.940.38
+0.80%
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF
IPAV31.990.20
+0.64%
Global X Infrastructure Dev ex-U.S. ETF
GIND25.070.07
+0.29%
Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF
SCEC24.51-0.03
-0.14%
Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF

IVW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVW has been closely correlated with RVTY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVW jumps, then RVTY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVW
1D Price
Change %
IVW100%
+0.33%
RVTY - IVW
68%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
TER - IVW
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
ETN - IVW
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
MS - IVW
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.25%
SWKS - IVW
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
More

XOVR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOVR has been closely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOVR jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XOVR
1D Price
Change %
XOVR100%
+1.75%
HOOD - XOVR
68%
Closely correlated
+13.70%
APP - XOVR
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
NVDA - XOVR
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
TSLA - XOVR
54%
Loosely correlated
+5.14%
ORCL - XOVR
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.10%
More