KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 22 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| IWF | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 87% | 24 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LITP | 12.17 | 0.41 | +3.49% |
| Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | |||
| IYW | 194.59 | 1.22 | +0.63% |
| iShares US Technology ETF | |||
| TBUX | 49.93 | 0.03 | +0.06% |
| T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF | |||
| PQJA | 28.34 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM NASDAQ-100 BUFFER 12 ETF - JANUARY | |||
| WTMF | 37.44 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +3.95% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLAC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KLAC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLAC | 100% | +3.95% | ||
| LRCX - KLAC | 91% Closely correlated | +3.88% | ||
| AMAT - KLAC | 89% Closely correlated | +4.45% | ||
| ASML - KLAC | 81% Closely correlated | +3.51% | ||
| ADI - KLAC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| QCOM - KLAC | 77% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
More | ||||