36 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
IWF vs KLAC
IWF vs KLAC Comparison
Open Charts IWF vs KLAC
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$417.05
Change-$1.89 (-0.45%)
Volume$19.93K
CapitalizationN/A
IWF vs KLAC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWF vs. KLAC commentary
Dec 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWF is a Buy and KLAC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KLAC: Fundamental Ratings
KLAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWF | KLAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KALL | 20.79 | 0.28 | +1.38% |
| KraneShares MSCI All China ETF | |||
| QCLN | 36.40 | -0.04 | -0.11% |
| First Trust NASDAQ® Cln Edge® GrnEngyETF | |||
| BMAR | 46.64 | -0.06 | -0.13% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - Mar | |||
| RPHS | 10.42 | -0.04 | -0.39% |
| Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF | |||
| FDVV | 51.11 | -0.24 | -0.47% |
| Fidelity High Dividend ETF | |||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||