IWM
Price
$299.96
Change
+$2.29 (+0.77%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
81.62B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMLF
Price
$89.29
Change
+$0.71 (+0.80%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
4.3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IWM vs SMLF

IWM vs SMLF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) vs. iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) provides broad, market-cap-weighted exposure to approximately 2,000 U.S. small-cap stocks via the Russell 2000 Index, emphasizing diversification across the small-cap segment.
  • iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) employs a rules-based multifactor strategy targeting momentum, quality, value, and low volatility within small-cap equities, resulting in a more concentrated portfolio of roughly 900 holdings and a lower expense ratio of 0.15% versus 0.19% for IWM.
  • Structural differences include IWM’s passive, broad-market approach versus SMLF’s optimized factor exposure, which can lead to varying sector tilts and risk-adjusted profiles over market cycles.
  • Both ETFs focus exclusively on U.S. small-cap equities, offering investors complementary or alternative tools for accessing the same market segment with distinct methodologies.
  • Liquidity favors IWM due to significantly higher average daily trading volume, while SMLF offers potential cost and factor-based efficiency advantages for longer-term holders.
  • Relative positioning depends on investor preferences for pure market-beta exposure versus enhanced factor characteristics within small-cap allocations.

Introduction

Small-capitalization U.S. equities have drawn renewed attention amid shifting interest-rate expectations and sector rotation dynamics in recent market cycles. The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) and iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) both target this segment but pursue different strategies. IWM delivers straightforward, market-cap-weighted exposure to the Russell 2000 Index, while SMLF applies a multifactor overlay designed to enhance returns through systematic tilts. These ETFs do not compete directly as identical products; rather, they represent alternative implementations of small-cap exposure that may suit distinct investor objectives within the same broad category.

iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) Overview

The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) seeks to track the Russell 2000 Index, which measures the performance of the small-capitalization segment of the U.S. equity market. The fund maintains a passive structure with physical replication and typically holds around 2,000 securities. Top holdings are broadly dispersed, with individual positions generally below 0.5% of assets. Sector allocations typically feature meaningful exposure to health care, financials, and industrials. The expense ratio stands at 0.19%. As a standard market-cap-weighted vehicle, IWM rebalances in line with index methodology, providing comprehensive small-cap representation without active security selection.

iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) Overview

The iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) tracks the STOXX U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor Index, which selects and weights small-cap stocks to maximize exposure to four target factors: momentum, quality, value, and low volatility. The ETF follows a passive, rules-based approach with approximately 900 holdings. Top positions reflect the optimized factor construction, often concentrating modestly higher weights in select names compared with pure market-cap benchmarks. Sector breakdowns tend to emphasize industrials and information technology relative to broader small-cap indexes. The expense ratio is 0.15%. Rebalancing occurs according to the index rules, delivering a multifactor small-cap strategy within a single fund vehicle.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. small-cap equity space operates within a macroeconomic environment shaped by monetary policy trajectories, earnings growth differentials versus large-cap peers, and evolving regulatory considerations. Capital flows into small-cap strategies have varied with interest-rate sentiment and domestic economic data releases in recent cycles. Sector-specific catalysts, including technology adoption and industrial activity, continue to influence underlying company fundamentals. Risks include heightened sensitivity to domestic economic conditions and potential volatility associated with smaller firm balance sheets. These factors create a backdrop in which both broad-market and factor-enhanced small-cap vehicles can serve distinct roles depending on prevailing conditions.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent weeks and months, iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has reflected broad small-cap market movements, with performance driven by aggregate index constituents. iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) has exhibited characteristics consistent with its factor construction, potentially showing differentiated behavior during periods of sector rotation or shifts in momentum and value leadership. Relative positioning highlights IWM’s emphasis on market-beta exposure versus SMLF’s tilt toward quality and low-volatility characteristics, which can influence drawdown profiles and recovery patterns across market cycles. Volatility differences stem from these structural distinctions rather than isolated price movements.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) due to its lower expense ratio, multifactor methodology, and potential for enhanced risk-adjusted exposure within the small-cap segment. iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) remains a strong alternative for investors prioritizing maximum diversification and benchmark fidelity. Selection ultimately depends on alignment with specific portfolio objectives and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IWM vs. SMLF commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWM is a Hold and SMLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWM has more net assets: 81.6B vs. SMLF (4.3B). IWM has a higher annual dividend yield than SMLF: IWM (22.363) vs SMLF (19.837). IWM was incepted earlier than SMLF: IWM (26 years) vs SMLF (11 years). SMLF (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than IWM (0.19). SMLF has a higher turnover IWM (18.00) vs IWM (18.00).
IWMSMLFIWM / SMLF
Gain YTD22.36319.837113%
Net Assets81.6B4.3B1,897%
Total Expense Ratio0.190.15127%
Turnover18.0024.0075%
Yield0.911.0289%
Fund Existence26 years11 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IWMSMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUMG48.480.50
+1.04%
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
INEQ42.130.38
+0.90%
Columbia Intl Equ Income ETF
DLAG33.580.01
+0.03%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Dl Drctl Buf ETF - Aug
TABD24.62-0.04
-0.14%
Transamerica Bond Active ETF
IYE67.36-0.12
-0.18%
iShares US Energy ETF

IWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IWM
1D Price
Change %
IWM100%
+0.77%
APG - IWM
68%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
SSD - IWM
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
CVNA - IWM
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
FIX - IWM
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
ONTO - IWM
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
More