Intraday BUY SELL Signals
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
IWM vs ONTO
IWM vs ONTO Comparison
Open Charts IWM vs ONTO
IWM vs ONTO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
IWM vs. ONTO commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWM is a Hold and ONTO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ONTO: Fundamental Ratings
ONTO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IWM | ONTO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
IWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWM has been closely correlated with APG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWM jumps, then APG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWM | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| APG - IWM | 68% Closely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| SSD - IWM | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| CVNA - IWM | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| FIX - IWM | 46% Loosely correlated | +4.92% | ||
| ONTO - IWM | 41% Loosely correlated | +5.36% | ||
More | ||||
ONTO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONTO has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ONTO jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONTO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONTO | 100% | +5.36% | ||
| AMAT - ONTO | 83% Closely correlated | +6.51% | ||
| LRCX - ONTO | 82% Closely correlated | +6.98% | ||
| KLAC - ONTO | 81% Closely correlated | +4.74% | ||
| ENTG - ONTO | 79% Closely correlated | +5.63% | ||
| UCTT - ONTO | 78% Closely correlated | +4.59% | ||
More | ||||