IWS
Price
$164.18
Change
-$1.03 (-0.62%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
15.05B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VFLO
Price
$53.00
Change
-$0.58 (-1.08%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Net Assets
11.14B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IWS vs VFLO

IWS vs VFLO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 01, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) vs. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) offers broad passive exposure to approximately 710 mid-capitalization U.S. value stocks via the Russell Midcap Value Index, while VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) employs a rules-based strategy selecting large-capitalization companies with high free cash flow yields.
  • IWS maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.23% compared to VFLO’s 0.39%, providing a cost advantage for long-term investors focused on mid-cap value exposure.
  • VFLO concentrates on large-cap names screened for free cash flow metrics, resulting in a more concentrated portfolio with potentially higher sector tilts toward technology, energy, and healthcare relative to traditional value benchmarks.
  • Both ETFs target value-oriented strategies but differ in market-cap focus, with IWS emphasizing mid-cap undervaluation and VFLO prioritizing cash-flow generation within large caps.
  • Structural differences in holdings count, index methodology, and liquidity profiles position the funds as complementary rather than direct substitutes within diversified equity allocations.
  • Expense ratios, rebalancing frequency, and sector allocations represent durable characteristics that influence relative risk profiles across market cycles.

Introduction

Investors seeking value exposure often evaluate mid-cap and large-cap strategies side by side. iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) represent distinct approaches within the value universe. IWS tracks a traditional mid-cap value index, while VFLO applies a free-cash-flow screen to large-cap equities. The funds do not compete directly but offer alternative pathways for investors pursuing discounted valuations, making them relevant for portfolio construction in the current environment of sector rotation and earnings-focused strategies.

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) Overview

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the Russell Midcap Value Index. The fund holds approximately 710 securities, providing diversified exposure to mid-capitalization U.S. equities exhibiting value characteristics such as lower price-to-book ratios. Top holdings typically include companies such as Phillips 66, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and Digital Realty Trust. Sector allocations emphasize financials, industrials, and real estate, with limited technology weighting relative to growth-oriented benchmarks. The expense ratio stands at 0.23%. As an open-end fund structure, IWS employs full replication where feasible and rebalances in line with the underlying index methodology, typically on a quarterly basis.

VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) Overview

VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) is a passively managed, rules-based exchange-traded fund tracking the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index. The strategy selects approximately 50 large-capitalization companies based on free cash flow yield and growth filters. Holdings concentrate in sectors including information technology, energy, and healthcare. The expense ratio is 0.39%. VFLO launched in June 2023 and utilizes a replication approach to mirror the index. Rebalancing occurs according to the index rules, with emphasis on companies demonstrating strong cash generation relative to the broader large-cap market.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the broader U.S. equity value segment, influenced by interest rate expectations, corporate earnings cycles, and capital allocation trends. Mid-cap value names in IWS respond to domestic economic indicators and credit conditions, while VFLO’s free-cash-flow focus aligns with investor preference for balance-sheet strength amid macroeconomic uncertainty. Sector momentum in energy, financials, and technology continues to shape relative performance across value strategies, with regulatory developments in healthcare and industrials adding further context.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, IWS has delivered exposure consistent with traditional mid-cap value benchmarks, exhibiting sensitivity to domestic growth and interest-rate movements. VFLO’s free-cash-flow screen has positioned it toward companies with resilient cash generation, potentially offering different volatility characteristics during earnings seasons. Relative positioning highlights IWS’s broader diversification versus VFLO’s concentrated large-cap tilt, affecting behavior during sector rotations and macroeconomic shifts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your ETF analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural factors including lower expense ratio, broader diversification, and established index methodology, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorability to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and mid-cap value exposure. VFLO’s free-cash-flow approach offers distinct large-cap characteristics that may suit complementary allocations, though its higher cost and concentration warrant consideration of specific investor objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IWS vs. VFLO commentary
Sep 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IWS is a Hold and VFLO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWS has more net assets: 15.1B vs. VFLO (11.1B). VFLO has a higher annual dividend yield than IWS: VFLO (35.471) vs IWS (17.199). IWS was incepted earlier than VFLO: IWS (25 years) vs VFLO (3 years). IWS (0.23) has a lower expense ratio than VFLO (0.39). VFLO has a higher turnover IWS (15.00) vs IWS (15.00).
IWSVFLOIWS / VFLO
Gain YTD17.19935.47148%
Net Assets15.1B11.1B136%
Total Expense Ratio0.230.3959%
Turnover15.00149.0010%
Yield1.281.01127%
Fund Existence25 years3 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IWSVFLO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
IWS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VFLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSMX82.161.27
+1.57%
Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X ETF (TSMX)
IHI51.770.07
+0.14%
iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI)
EPEM30.90N/A
N/A
Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
OVB19.84-0.05
-0.25%
Overlay Shares Core Bond ETF (OVB)
SVAL42.17-0.29
-0.67%
iShares US Small Cap Value Factor ETF (SVAL)

VFLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VFLO has been loosely correlated with ABNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VFLO jumps, then ABNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VFLO
1D Price
Change %
VFLO100%
-1.08%
ABNB - VFLO
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
ALGN - VFLO
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
DOCU - VFLO
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
PAYX - VFLO
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
DOX - VFLO
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
More