| IXJ | TMED | IXJ / TMED | |
| Gain YTD | 10.675 | 22.158 | 48% |
| Net Assets | 4.4B | 31.8M | 13,824% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.44 | 91% |
| Turnover | 2.00 | 44.00 | 5% |
| Yield | 1.44 | 0.48 | 302% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 1 year | - |
| IXJ | TMED | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% | 10 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IXJ has been closely correlated with LLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IXJ jumps, then LLY could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that TMED and LLY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMED and LLY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMED | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMED | 100% | +1.13% | ||
| LLY - TMED | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| UNH - TMED | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
| ALNY - TMED | 13% Poorly correlated | +3.02% | ||
| DHR - TMED | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
| GILD - TMED | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.87% | ||
More | ||||