IYF
Price
$125.09
Change
-$0.32 (-0.26%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.52B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IYG
Price
$88.09
Change
-$0.71 (-0.80%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.93B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IYF vs IYG

Header iconIYF vs IYG Comparison
Open Charts IYF vs IYGBanner chart's image
IYF vs IYG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) vs. iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG)

Key Takeaways

  • IYF offers broader exposure to the U.S. financial sector, including significant insurance holdings (18.50%), while IYG focuses narrowly on financial services like banks and payments, excluding most insurers.
  • Both ETFs share identical expense ratios of 0.38% and passive structures, but IYF provides greater diversification with 141 holdings versus IYG's 99.
  • Top holdings overlap heavily in mega-caps like BRK.B and JPM, but IYG concentrates more in payments leaders such as V and MA.
  • IYF demonstrates higher liquidity with a 30-day average daily volume around 560,000 shares, compared to IYG's approximately 163,000 shares.
  • IYG's top 10 holdings represent over 62% of assets, indicating higher concentration risk relative to IYF's roughly 49%.
  • Both benefit from financial sector tailwinds like elevated interest rates but face risks from regulatory scrutiny and economic slowdowns.

Introduction

In the current market environment, where interest rates remain elevated and sector rotation favors cyclicals, comparing iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) helps investors weigh broad financial exposure against targeted financial services plays. These passive ETFs from BlackRock provide alternative pathways to the U.S. financial sector, which has shown resilience amid net interest margin expansion for banks and steady growth in payments processing. IYF captures the full financial universe, including insurers, while IYG hones in on banks, asset managers, and payment networks. This ETF comparison highlights structural differences in diversification, concentration, and sub-sector tilts, aiding decisions on sector exposure amid macroeconomic shifts like potential rate adjustments and regulatory developments.

iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) Overview

The iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) is a passive ETF that seeks to track the Russell 1000 Financials 40 Act 15/22.5 Daily Capped Index, a float-adjusted, market-cap-weighted benchmark of large- and mid-cap U.S. financial equities. This index applies quarterly caps—no single issuer exceeds 15%, and issuers over 4.5% collectively cap at 22.5%—with daily monitoring to promote diversification. IYF holds 141 securities, with top 10 holdings comprising about 49% of assets: BRK.B (11.29%), JPM (10.90%), BAC (4.71%), WFC (4.19%), GS (4.19%), and others including C, MS, SCHW, BLK, and SPGI.

Sector allocations emphasize financial services (46.95%), banks (33.88%), and insurance (18.50%), with minor exposure to professional services and cash. The expense ratio is 0.38%, and the fund exhibits strong liquidity with a 30-day median bid/ask spread of 0.03% and average daily volume exceeding 560,000 shares. Launched in 2000 on NYSE Arca, IYF suits investors seeking comprehensive financial sector access without stock selection.

iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) Overview

The iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) passively tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services Index, a market-cap-weighted gauge of U.S. equities in financial services, encompassing banks, investment firms, asset managers, credit card companies, and exchanges. With 99 holdings, it features higher concentration, as top 10 account for over 62%: BRK.B (13.21%), JPM (12.69%), V (7.80%), MA (6.22%), BAC (5.31%), WFC (4.02%), GS (4.01%), C (3.31%), MS (3.27%), and AXP (2.60%).

Sector weights focus on financial services (65.00%) and banks (34.77%), with negligible cash. Matching IYF's 0.38% expense ratio, IYG offers solid liquidity via a 0.04% 30-day median bid/ask spread and average daily volume around 163,000 shares. Since its 2000 inception on NYSE Arca, IYG appeals to those targeting high-growth financial services sub-sectors like payments over broader financials.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. financial sector, representing banks, insurers, and services firms, thrives on higher-for-longer interest rates boosting net interest margins (NIM) and fee income from robust consumer spending. Recent market cycles have seen capital flows into cyclicals amid cooling inflation and steady employment, though geopolitical tensions and oil price volatility introduce risks. Regulatory developments, including heightened scrutiny on bank capital requirements and fintech oversight, could pressure margins. Macro drivers like potential Federal Reserve rate path adjustments—balancing inflation and growth—favor diversified financial exposure. Insurers benefit from investment income, while payments networks ride transaction volume growth. Sector risks include credit cycle downturns, rising delinquencies in a slowdown, and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) restrictions, underscoring the need for structural diversification in ETF positioning.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months through early 2026, both IYF and IYG have navigated financial sector headwinds from shifting rate expectations and equity volatility, posting year-to-date declines around 6-7%. IYG has shown slightly higher beta (1.07 vs. IYF's 1.02 over five years), reflecting its tilt toward growth-oriented payments like V and MA, which amplify upside in risk-on environments but elevate volatility during rotations. IYF's insurance allocation has provided relative stability, muting drawdowns amid broader market cycles. Over multi-year horizons, both have delivered strong compounded returns, with IYG edging ahead in bull phases due to concentration in mega-bank and fintech leaders. Positioning favors IYF for defensive diversification, while IYG suits momentum plays tied to earnings cycles and consumer trends. Volatility profiles align closely, though IYF's broader holdings reduce single-stock risks.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that empowers traders and investors to filter thousands of assets using customizable criteria like technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-generated signals. Users can scan by industry, market capitalization, price patterns, performance metrics, and technical indicators such as moving averages, RSI (Relative Strength Index), or breakout setups to uncover trade ideas, trending opportunities, and breakout candidates efficiently. This surpasses manual screening by delivering data-driven insights and pattern recognition at scale. Explore the AI Screener today to streamline your market analysis and identify high-potential ETFs like IYF and IYG.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors IYF due to its superior diversification across 141 holdings and sub-sectors like insurance, lower concentration risk (top 10 at 49% vs. IYG's 62%), and enhanced liquidity profile. While both share cost efficiency and sector momentum benefits, IYF's structural breadth offers better risk-adjusted positioning amid uncertain rate paths and regulatory headwinds, with a higher probability of resilient performance in varied market cycles.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IYF vs. IYG commentary
Jun 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IYF is a StrongBuy and IYG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYF has more net assets: 3.52B vs. IYG (1.93B). IYF has a higher annual dividend yield than IYG: IYF (-2.249) vs IYG (-3.426). IYF was incepted earlier than IYG: IYF (26 years) vs IYG (26 years). IYF (0.38) and IYG (0.38) have comparable expense ratios . IYF has a higher turnover IYG (3.00) vs IYG (3.00).
IYFIYGIYF / IYG
Gain YTD-2.249-3.42666%
Net Assets3.52B1.93B183%
Total Expense Ratio0.380.38100%
Turnover8.003.00267%
Yield1.551.12139%
Fund Existence26 years26 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IYFIYG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IYG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LOTI25.870.17
+0.65%
Liberty One Tactical Income ETF
NVDQ11.260.06
+0.54%
T-REX 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
BAUG52.96-0.04
-0.08%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF Aug
PJUL48.50-0.06
-0.13%
Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-Jul
BALQ55.33-0.62
-1.11%
iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF

IYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYF has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYF jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IYF
1D Price
Change %
IYF100%
+0.88%
BAC - IYF
80%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
JPM - IYF
80%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
C - IYF
79%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
CFG - IYF
78%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
TFC - IYF
77%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
More

IYG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYG has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYG jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IYG
1D Price
Change %
IYG100%
+1.02%
BAC - IYG
82%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
COF - IYG
82%
Closely correlated
+1.64%
JPM - IYG
81%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
C - IYG
81%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
AXP - IYG
78%
Closely correlated
+1.95%
More