IYG
Price
$91.90
Change
+$1.43 (+1.58%)
Updated
Jun 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.97B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VFH
Price
$133.26
Change
+$1.88 (+1.43%)
Updated
Jun 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
13.46B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IYG vs VFH

Header iconIYG vs VFH Comparison
Open Charts IYG vs VFHBanner chart's image
IYG vs VFH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) vs. iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG)

Key Takeaways

  • VFH offers broader exposure across the entire financials sector with 417 holdings, including banks, insurance, and diversified financials, while IYG focuses narrowly on financial services with 101 holdings, emphasizing banks and payment processors.
  • VFH's expense ratio of 0.09% provides significant cost efficiency over IYG's 0.38%, benefiting long-term investors through lower drag on returns.
  • Both ETFs exhibit high concentration in top holdings like JPM and BRK.B, but VFH's larger portfolio enhances diversification and reduces single-stock risk.
  • IYG displays higher volatility due to its targeted financial services tilt, contrasting VFH's more balanced risk profile across financial sub-industries.
  • VFH benefits from superior liquidity with higher average daily volume, making it easier for investors to enter and exit positions.
  • Structural differences position VFH for comprehensive sector plays, while IYG suits targeted bets on banking and brokerage momentum.

Introduction

In the evolving financial sector landscape, comparing Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) highlights key alternatives for sector exposure. VFH provides broad coverage of U.S. financials, encompassing banks, insurers, and asset managers, while IYG targets a narrower financial services subset, including investment banking, brokerage, and payment networks. These ETFs appeal to investors rotating into financials amid shifting interest rate expectations and economic resilience. Though overlapping in major holdings, their index methodologies and scopes offer distinct risk-return profiles, enabling tactical allocation based on views of subsector momentum versus comprehensive diversification.

Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) Overview

The Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is a passively managed fund seeking to track the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Financials 25/50, which includes large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. companies in the financials sector per Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). It holds 417 stocks, providing extensive diversification across sub-industries like diversified banks (22.9%), transaction & payment processing (15.3%), multi-sector holdings (7.8%), property & casualty insurance (8.1%), and asset management & custody banks (7.9%). Top holdings include JPMorgan Chase (9.3%), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B, 8.4%), MAstercard (5.3%), and Visa (4.3%). The expense ratio is a low 0.09%, with a turnover rate of 5.1%. VFH employs full replication where possible, minimizing tracking error, and exhibits strong liquidity with average daily volume exceeding 800,000 shares.

iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) Overview

The iShares U.S. Financial Services ETF (IYG) passively tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financial Services Index, focusing on U.S. equities in financial services like investment banking, commercial banking, asset management, and securities exchanges. It comprises 101 holdings, with heavy weighting in banks (34.77%) and financial services (65%). Top holdings feature Berkshire Hathaway Class B (13.21%), JPMorgan Chase (12.69%), Visa Class A (7.80%), MAstercard Class A (6.22%), and Bank of America (5.31%). The expense ratio stands at 0.38%. IYG offers targeted exposure with a median bid-ask spread of 0.04% and average daily volume around 163,000 shares, supporting efficient trading for sector-specific views.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The U.S. financial sector navigates a dynamic environment shaped by interest rate trajectories, regulatory evolution, and macroeconomic shifts. Recent Federal Reserve rate adjustments have bolstered net interest margins (NIM) for banks, though persistent inflation concerns temper optimism. Proposed capital rule changes for Category I and II banks aim to enhance resilience, potentially impacting lending and securitization activities. Capital flows favor financials amid economic resilience, with AI-driven efficiencies and stablecoin innovations spurring growth in payments and brokerage. However, risks include geopolitical tensions, credit cycle shifts, and heightened scrutiny on non-bank financials. Sector rotation toward value-oriented financials persists, driven by earnings strength in major banks and insurers.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, both ETFs have mirrored financial sector dynamics, with quarterly declines around 6-8% amid broader market rotations, offset by over 15% gains over the past year through late 2025. IYG has shown relative strength in recent weeks, buoyed by momentum in payment giants like Visa and Mastercard amid rising transaction volumes, alongside banking earnings beats. VFH's broader exposure introduces modest drag from insurance and regional banks sensitive to rate expectations, yet its diversification tempers volatility compared to IYG's concentrated services tilt. Relative positioning favors IYG in high-momentum cycles driven by brokerage and payments, while VFH excels in diversified sector upswings, exhibiting lower standard deviation over market cycles.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that empowers traders and investors to filter thousands of assets using technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Customizable filters span industries, market capitalization, technical indicators like RSI and moving averages, price patterns such as breakouts, and performance metrics including relative strength. The platform efficiently uncovers trade ideas, trending opportunities, and breakout candidates, surpassing manual screening in speed and precision. Explore it today to refine your ETF comparison and identify market edges.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors VFH with moderate confidence (65% probability) for most investors. Its superior cost efficiency (0.09% expense ratio), extensive diversification (417 holdings), and balanced financials exposure provide structural advantages over IYG's narrower focus and higher fees. While IYG may lead in services-driven rallies, VFH's liquidity, lower volatility, and comprehensive sector coverage align better with sustained momentum and risk-adjusted positioning in the current environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IYG vs. VFH commentary
Jun 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IYG is a Buy and VFH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFH has more net assets: 13.5B vs. IYG (1.97B). IYG has a higher annual dividend yield than VFH: IYG (-1.360) vs VFH (-1.562). IYG was incepted earlier than VFH: IYG (26 years) vs VFH (22 years). VFH (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than IYG (0.38). VFH has a higher turnover IYG (3.00) vs IYG (3.00).
IYGVFHIYG / VFH
Gain YTD-1.360-1.56287%
Net Assets1.97B13.5B15%
Total Expense Ratio0.380.09422%
Turnover3.005.0060%
Yield1.121.5473%
Fund Existence26 years22 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IYGVFH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IYG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VFH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OPEG4.430.29
+7.06%
Leverage Shares 2X Long OPEN Daily ETF
CAFG32.620.32
+1.00%
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
NBSM27.410.10
+0.37%
Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF
CGIB25.510.07
+0.29%
Capital Group Intl Bd ETF USD-Hdg
BBAG45.830.01
+0.02%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Aggt Bond ETF

IYG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYG has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYG jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IYG
1D Price
Change %
IYG100%
+0.48%
BAC - IYG
82%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
COF - IYG
81%
Closely correlated
+5.35%
JPM - IYG
81%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
C - IYG
81%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
AXP - IYG
78%
Closely correlated
+3.05%
More

VFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VFH has been closely correlated with COF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VFH jumps, then COF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VFH
1D Price
Change %
VFH100%
+0.31%
COF - VFH
81%
Closely correlated
+5.35%
AXP - VFH
79%
Closely correlated
+3.05%
ASB - VFH
79%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
BAC - VFH
78%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
FNB - VFH
77%
Closely correlated
-1.88%
More