IYW
Price
$257.54
Change
-$2.40 (-0.92%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
25.61B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STK
Price
$57.46
Change
-$0.22 (-0.38%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
976.49M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IYW vs STK

Header iconIYW vs STK Comparison
Open Charts IYW vs STKBanner chart's image
IYW vs STK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) vs. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK)

Key Takeaways

  • iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) is a low-cost passive exchange-traded fund (ETF) tracking a capped technology index, offering broad exposure to U.S. technology equities with approximately 144 holdings and an expense ratio of 0.38%.
  • Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK) is an actively managed closed-end fund (CEF) focused on technology and technology-related companies, incorporating an options overlay strategy for income generation and downside mitigation, with higher fees around 1.12% and fewer holdings.
  • Both target the technology sector but differ fundamentally: IYW emphasizes diversified, market-cap-weighted passive replication, while STK blends active stock selection with options for enhanced yield and risk management.
  • IYW provides greater liquidity and lower structural costs typical of ETFs, whereas STK may trade at a discount or premium to its net asset value (NAV) due to its closed-end structure.
  • Sector exposure in both centers on technology, with IYW heavily weighted toward large-cap leaders and STK allowing more concentrated active bets alongside income features.
  • Investors seeking cost-efficient, broad technology market exposure may lean toward IYW, while those prioritizing active management and potential income from options strategies may consider STK.

Introduction

Technology sector exposure remains a core consideration for many investors amid ongoing innovation in semiconductors, software, and digital infrastructure. The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK) both provide access to this space but through distinct vehicles and strategies. IYW delivers passive, index-based replication of U.S. technology equities, while STK employs active management with an options overlay. They do not compete directly as identical products but serve as complementary or alternative approaches for investors seeking technology sector participation with different risk, cost, and income profiles.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) Overview

The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index. This index measures the performance of U.S. technology companies within the Russell 1000 Index, subject to concentration caps. The fund typically holds around 144 securities. Top holdings often include major technology names such as NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), and Alphabet Inc (GOOGL and GOOG). Sector allocation is concentrated in information technology, with secondary exposure to communication services. The expense ratio stands at 0.38%. As a standard equity ETF listed on NYSE Arca, it offers high liquidity, transparent daily holdings, and market-cap weighting with periodic rebalancing aligned to the underlying index methodology.

Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK) Overview

The Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK) is an actively managed closed-end fund that invests primarily in equity securities of technology and technology-related companies. The strategy targets long-term capital appreciation and current income, typically maintaining 60-80 holdings. An options overlay strategy supplements the equity portfolio to generate additional income and provide some downside protection. Expense ratios are higher, around 1.12%. The fund may trade at a discount or premium to its net asset value (NAV). Portfolio turnover is moderate, and the structure allows for active security selection without the daily creation/redemption mechanism of traditional ETFs.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from secular trends including artificial intelligence adoption, semiconductor demand, cloud computing expansion, and digital transformation across industries. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations, corporate capital expenditure cycles, and global supply chain developments influence the environment. Regulatory scrutiny on large technology platforms and geopolitical tensions affecting semiconductor exports represent ongoing risks. Capital flows into technology strategies remain robust during periods of growth optimism, though valuation sensitivity can lead to volatility when growth outlooks shift.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both funds have reflected technology sector dynamics driven by earnings from leading semiconductor and software companies. IYW’s passive approach has provided consistent exposure aligned with broad technology index returns, with lower volatility relative to more concentrated active strategies in some periods. STK’s active management and options overlay have introduced elements of income generation and potential cushioning during drawdowns, though at the cost of higher fees and structural trading characteristics. Relative positioning highlights IYW’s emphasis on liquidity and cost efficiency versus STK’s focus on active selection and yield enhancement within the same overarching technology theme.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional technology-focused opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural efficiency, lower expense ratio, broad diversification, and high liquidity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to the iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) for investors prioritizing cost-effective, passive technology sector exposure. STK offers distinct active and income features that may appeal in specific yield-oriented or tactical contexts, but the passive ETF’s profile aligns more closely with durable, scalable sector access in most market environments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IYW vs. STK commentary
Jun 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IYW is a StrongBuy and STK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYW has more net assets: 25.6B vs. STK (976M). STK has a higher annual dividend yield than IYW: STK (60.107) vs IYW (30.226). IYW was incepted earlier than STK: IYW (26 years) vs STK (17 years). IYW (0.38) has a lower expense ratio than STK (1.26). STK has a higher turnover IYW (7.00) vs IYW (7.00).
IYWSTKIYW / STK
Gain YTD30.22660.10750%
Net Assets25.6B976M2,623%
Total Expense Ratio0.381.2630%
Turnover7.0030.0023%
Yield0.110.00-
Fund Existence26 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IYWSTK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IYW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCUS46.671.45
+3.21%
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
USRT63.860.33
+0.52%
iShares Core US REIT ETF
GMAY43.270.10
+0.23%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - May
MAXJ29.00N/A
-0.02%
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
LMTL31.79-0.58
-1.79%
Direxion Daily LMT Bull 2X ETF

IYW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IYW
1D Price
Change %
IYW100%
+0.76%
NVDA - IYW
75%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
LRCX - IYW
69%
Closely correlated
+5.45%
AVGO - IYW
67%
Closely correlated
+4.70%
AMD - IYW
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.24%
MKSI - IYW
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.33%
More

STK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STK and LRCX have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STK and LRCX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STK
1D Price
Change %
STK100%
+2.36%
LRCX - STK
18%
Poorly correlated
+5.45%
AMAT - STK
17%
Poorly correlated
+6.96%
TER - STK
16%
Poorly correlated
+6.27%
AAPL - STK
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
MSFT - STK
13%
Poorly correlated
-4.17%
More