IYW
Price
$243.35
Change
+$7.95 (+3.38%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
23.4B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XSD
Price
$597.57
Change
+$40.66 (+7.30%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
3.15B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IYW vs XSD

Header iconIYW vs XSD Comparison
Open Charts IYW vs XSDBanner chart's image
IYW vs XSD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) vs. State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD)

Key Takeaways

  • IYW provides broad U.S. technology sector exposure through approximately 139 holdings, market-cap weighted with caps on individual (22.5%) and issuer (45%) positions, while XSD offers targeted semiconductor focus via 44 equal-weighted holdings.
  • Top holdings differ markedly: IYW dominated by mega-caps like NVDA (16%), AAPL (14%), and Alphabet classes; XSD spreads across mid- and small-caps like MaxLinear (7%), INTC (4%), and SiTime (4%).
  • Sector allocations highlight divergence: IYW ~82% technology with communication services (~18%), versus XSD's 100% semiconductors, implying higher concentration risk for XSD.
  • Expense ratios are competitive at 0.38% for IYW and 0.35% for XSD, with both passive structures tracking modified indices quarterly reviewed.
  • XSD exhibits higher volatility due to equal-weighting and niche focus, while IYW benefits from mega-cap stability but less pure-play AI/semiconductor upside.
  • In AI-driven markets, XSD's semiconductor purity positions it for stronger momentum, though IYW offers superior diversification.

Introduction

In the current market environment fueled by artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure expansion and hyperscaler capital expenditures, comparing IYW and XSD reveals complementary yet distinct technology exposures. IYW delivers diversified access to the broad U.S. technology sector, encompassing software, hardware, and services. XSD, conversely, provides concentrated exposure to the semiconductor sub-industry, a critical enabler of AI advancements. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve alternative strategies: IYW for comprehensive tech allocation, XSD for targeted bets on chipmakers amid surging demand for high-bandwidth memory and processors. Investors weighing sector rotation toward AI catalysts find this pairing relevant for balancing breadth against depth.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) Overview

The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) is a passive ETF that tracks the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, comprising U.S. equities in the technology sector from the top 95% of the market by market cap. It holds approximately 139 stocks, market-cap weighted with individual name caps at 22.5% and total issuer caps at 45% to mitigate concentration risk. Top holdings include NVDA (~16%), AAPL (~14%), GOOGL (~8%), GOOG (~6%), and MSFT (~4%). Sector allocation emphasizes technology (~82%), with communication services (~18%), industrials (~1%), and minor consumer cyclical exposure. The expense ratio is 0.38%, with quarterly distributions and annual reconstitution plus quarterly reviews. Launched in 2000, IYW suits investors seeking diversified tech exposure without excessive single-stock reliance.

State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) Overview

The State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) is a passive ETF tracking the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index, a modified equal-weighted benchmark representing the semiconductors segment of the S&P Total Market Index (S&P TMI). It maintains ~44 holdings, promoting unconcentrated exposure across large-, mid-, and small-cap semiconductor firms. Top holdings feature MaxLinear (~7%), INTC (~4%), SiTime (~4%), AMD (~4%), and Marvell (~3%). Allocation is 100% semiconductors, delivering pure-play focus. The expense ratio stands at 0.35%, with quarterly distributions. Inception in 2006, XSD rebalances to maintain equal weighting, enhancing liquidity and mid-cap participation while heightening sector-specific volatility. It appeals to those targeting the semiconductor supply chain.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector, particularly semiconductors, thrives amid AI infrastructure buildouts, with global chip revenues projected to exceed $1 trillion in 2026 driven by high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and hyperscaler investments. Catalysts include sustained capex from cloud giants, edge AI emergence, and 2nm process advancements, boosting demand for GPUs and processors. Capital flows favor semiconductors over broader tech, as AI chips capture ~50% of industry revenue despite low unit volume. Regulatory scrutiny on supply chains and U.S. reshoring via CHIPS Act (Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors) supports domestic firms. Macro drivers like interest rate stabilization aid growth stocks, while risks encompass cyclical downturns in non-AI chips, geopolitical tensions over Taiwan, and energy constraints in data centers. Both ETFs benefit, but XSD's focus amplifies AI tailwinds.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent months, XSD has demonstrated superior relative performance to IYW, propelled by semiconductor momentum in AI cycles, with reports of XSD outperforming by wide margins in three-month periods amid chip stock rallies. IYW's broader exposure tempers gains from mega-cap leaders like NVDA and AMD, linking outcomes to software/services stability. XSD's equal-weighting amplifies mid-cap volatility, yielding higher beta (~2.46) versus IYW (~1.36), evident in sharper drawdowns during sector rotations but stronger rebounds on earnings beats from diverse holdings. Positioning favors XSD in AI/semiconductor uptrends, while IYW provides resilience amid macro shifts like rate expectations or tech rotation.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions in dynamic sectors like technology and semiconductors. Explore it today to uncover ETF comparison insights and potential opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors XSD with moderate probability (~60-70%) due to its structural alignment with surging semiconductor momentum, lower expense ratio, balanced diversification via equal-weighting, and trend consistency in AI infrastructure cycles. While IYW excels in mega-cap stability and broader risk mitigation, XSD's pure exposure to high-growth chipmakers enhances relative positioning amid capital flows to AI enablers, despite elevated volatility.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
IYW vs. XSD commentary
Jun 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IYW is a Hold and XSD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IYW has more net assets: 23.4B vs. XSD (3.15B). XSD has a higher annual dividend yield than IYW: XSD (85.915) vs IYW (21.915). IYW was incepted earlier than XSD: IYW (26 years) vs XSD (20 years). XSD (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IYW (0.38). XSD has a higher turnover IYW (7.00) vs IYW (7.00).
IYWXSDIYW / XSD
Gain YTD21.91585.91526%
Net Assets23.4B3.15B744%
Total Expense Ratio0.380.35109%
Turnover7.0028.0025%
Yield0.110.1381%
Fund Existence26 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IYWXSD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IYW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XSD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBC42.221.55
+3.81%
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trls ETF
HOLA54.520.81
+1.51%
JPMorgan Intl Hdg Eq Ldrd Overlay ETF
DIVZ37.810.17
+0.45%
Polen Dividend Income ETF
NITE37.16N/A
N/A
The Nightview ETF
FSTA53.74-0.17
-0.32%
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples ETF

IYW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IYW
1D Price
Change %
IYW100%
+3.38%
NVDA - IYW
76%
Closely correlated
+2.22%
LRCX - IYW
70%
Closely correlated
+12.65%
AVGO - IYW
67%
Closely correlated
+3.62%
AMD - IYW
66%
Closely correlated
+7.97%
AMAT - IYW
65%
Loosely correlated
+11.19%
More

XSD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XSD has been closely correlated with SYNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XSD jumps, then SYNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XSD
1D Price
Change %
XSD100%
+7.30%
SYNA - XSD
81%
Closely correlated
+5.64%
MPWR - XSD
80%
Closely correlated
+7.91%
CEVA - XSD
78%
Closely correlated
+10.82%
ALGM - XSD
76%
Closely correlated
+7.68%
RMBS - XSD
73%
Closely correlated
+4.60%
More