Advertisement
JBL vs PLXS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Jabil Inc. (JBL) vs. Plexus Corp. (PLXS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Jabil Inc. (JBL) and Plexus Corp. (PLXS) are both leading electronics manufacturing services providers with strong year-to-date gains exceeding 68% and 100%, respectively, amid favorable market conditions.
- Jabil Inc. (JBL) has shown particular strength linked to artificial intelligence infrastructure demand, with its stock trading near all-time highs around $385 as of mid-June 2026.
- Plexus Corp. (PLXS) has delivered robust performance driven by diversified exposure across healthcare, industrial, and aerospace sectors, reaching levels near $295 recently.
- Both companies benefit from global supply chain recovery and technology spending, though Jabil Inc. (JBL) exhibits higher market capitalization and analyst attention ahead of its upcoming earnings.
- Relative momentum favors Jabil Inc. (JBL) in recent weeks due to AI-related catalysts, while Plexus Corp. (PLXS) offers steadier exposure to regulated, high-complexity manufacturing.
- Market sentiment remains constructive for both, supported by earnings growth expectations and sector tailwinds in electronics manufacturing.
Introduction
Jabil Inc. (JBL) and Plexus Corp. (PLXS) represent two prominent players in the electronics manufacturing services sector, making them natural candidates for comparison among investors seeking exposure to supply chain and technology manufacturing trends. This analysis examines their business models, recent stock behavior, and relative positioning in the current market environment. Traders and investors focused on growth-oriented industrials, technology supply chains, or sector rotation strategies may find this side-by-side review particularly relevant for assessing risk-reward profiles and portfolio allocation decisions.
Jabil Inc. (JBL) Overview and Recent Performance
Jabil Inc. (JBL) is a global provider of engineering, supply chain, and manufacturing solutions serving industries including networking, consumer electronics, automotive, and healthcare. The company operates across dozens of countries with a focus on high-volume and complex production. In recent market activity, Jabil Inc. (JBL) shares have advanced strongly, closing near $385 on June 12, 2026, reflecting year-to-date gains of approximately 69%. Performance has been supported by rising demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure, which has bolstered order visibility in data center and cloud segments. Analysts anticipate solid third-quarter results scheduled for June 17, 2026, with expectations centered on continued margin expansion and revenue growth in high-tech areas offsetting softer consumer segments.
Plexus Corp. (PLXS) Overview and Recent Performance
Plexus Corp. (PLXS) specializes in design, manufacturing, and supply chain services for complex, lower-volume products in regulated industries such as healthcare and life sciences, aerospace and defense, and industrial automation. Headquartered in Wisconsin, the company emphasizes high-reliability solutions for mission-critical applications. In recent market activity, Plexus Corp. (PLXS) shares have climbed to levels near $295 as of mid-June 2026, delivering year-to-date returns exceeding 100%. Recent quarterly results showed revenue growth and earnings beats in several periods, aided by strength in semiconductor capital equipment and energy-related demand. The stock has benefited from broad technology spending and diversification across end markets, contributing to consistent upward price movement over the past several weeks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform’s most effective AI trading bots suited to prevailing market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI trading bots that execute strategies across thousands of tickers, yet only those demonstrating superior performance metrics, adaptability, and relevance to current trends earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and statistical profiles, with many posting win rates between 60% and 80% or higher in backtested and live environments alongside varying drawdown levels. This diversity allows users to align bots with specific risk tolerances and market outlooks. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and deployment options.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Jabil Inc. (JBL) operates at a larger scale with greater emphasis on high-volume manufacturing and emerging technology areas such as artificial intelligence infrastructure, providing broader sector exposure but potentially higher sensitivity to cyclical electronics demand. Plexus Corp. (PLXS) focuses on higher-complexity, lower-volume products in regulated sectors, offering more defensive characteristics through long customer tenures and specialized expertise. Recent momentum has been robust for both, though Jabil Inc. (JBL) has recorded sharper percentage gains tied to AI catalysts, while Plexus Corp. (PLXS) shows steadier, diversified growth. Risk factors for Jabil Inc. (JBL) include exposure to consumer and automotive cycles; for Plexus Corp. (PLXS), concentration in healthcare and defense may introduce regulatory or geopolitical considerations. Market sentiment appears constructive across the electronics manufacturing services space, with both companies positioned to benefit from ongoing technology investment.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings momentum, and sector positioning, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term relative performance to Jabil Inc. (JBL). This assessment reflects stronger alignment with artificial intelligence-driven demand and upcoming catalysts, though Plexus Corp. (PLXS) maintains competitive stability through its diversified end markets. Outcomes remain subject to broader market conditions and company-specific execution.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JBL is a Hold and PLXS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JBL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePLXS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- JBL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PLXS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLXS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- JBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PLXS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
JBL (@Electronic Components) experienced а -8.90% price change this week, while PLXS (@Electronic Components) price change was -3.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.14%.
Reported Earning Dates
JBL is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2026.
PLXS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-2.80% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| JBL | PLXS | JBL / PLXS | |
| Capitalization | 35.8B | 7.36B | 486% |
| EBITDA | 1.99B | 297M | 669% |
| Gain YTD | 49.761 | 95.537 | 52% |
| P/E Ratio | 50.84 | 44.48 | 114% |
| Revenue | 32.7B | 4.31B | 759% |
| Total Cash | 1.06B | 303M | 350% |
| Total Debt | 4.39B | 260M | 1,688% |
JBL | PLXS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 13 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PLXS's Valuation (51) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JBL (79). This means that PLXS’s stock grew similarly to JBL’s over the last 12 months.
JBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as PLXS (10). This means that JBL’s stock grew similarly to PLXS’s over the last 12 months.
JBL's SMR Rating (19) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLXS (63). This means that JBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLXS’s over the last 12 months.
PLXS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JBL (42). This means that PLXS’s stock grew similarly to JBL’s over the last 12 months.
PLXS's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JBL (29). This means that PLXS’s stock grew similarly to JBL’s over the last 12 months.
| JBL | PLXS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 13 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 11 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
JBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JBL has been loosely correlated with FN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JBL jumps, then FN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JBL | 100% | -9.07% | ||
| FN - JBL | 64% Loosely correlated | -8.69% | ||
| KN - JBL | 63% Loosely correlated | -9.21% | ||
| TTMI - JBL | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PLXS - JBL | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| LFUS - JBL | 51% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||