FN
Price
$499.61
Change
-$47.57 (-8.69%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
17.9B
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
JBL
Price
$341.30
Change
-$34.04 (-9.07%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
35.76B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FN vs JBL

FN vs JBL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Fabrinet (FN) vs. Jabil (JBL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Fabrinet (FN) specializes in advanced optical and precision manufacturing services, delivering record quarterly revenue in its most recent earnings amid strong demand in datacom and high-performance computing.
  • Jabil (JBL) operates as a diversified electronics manufacturing services provider, benefiting from broad data center and AI-related demand while maintaining a larger scale across multiple end markets.
  • Over recent market activity, FN has shown higher volatility and stronger year-to-date gains compared to JBL, reflecting its concentrated exposure to optical networking growth drivers.
  • JBL's upcoming earnings release and prior forecast raises highlight its positioning in expanding data center supply chains, contrasting with FN's focus on specialized component packaging.
  • Both companies operate in technology hardware supply chains tied to AI infrastructure, yet differ in business model breadth, margin profiles, and sensitivity to supply constraints.
  • Relative performance metrics indicate FN's premium valuation aligns with its growth trajectory, while JBL offers broader diversification at a comparatively lower multiple.

Introduction

This comparison examines Fabrinet (FN) and Jabil (JBL), two technology hardware companies whose stocks appeal to investors seeking exposure to AI-driven supply chain trends. FN provides specialized optical packaging and manufacturing services primarily to networking and computing equipment makers. JBL delivers comprehensive electronics manufacturing services across consumer, automotive, healthcare, and industrial sectors. Traders and investors focused on relative performance, sector positioning within the broader technology supply chain, and momentum in data center and networking markets may find this analysis relevant for portfolio allocation decisions.

FN Overview and Recent Performance

Fabrinet (FN) delivers advanced optical packaging, precision optical components, and electro-mechanical manufacturing services. The company has reported consistent revenue growth tied to telecommunications and high-performance computing demand. In recent market activity, shares have traded near the upper end of their 52-week range following strong quarterly results that exceeded guidance in both revenue and earnings per share. Performance has reflected positive sentiment around AI-related optical networking needs, tempered by notes of datacom supply constraints in forward guidance. Broader timeframe references show FN maintaining elevated valuation multiples consistent with its specialized growth profile and operational execution.

JBL Overview and Recent Performance

Jabil (JBL) provides electronics manufacturing services including design, production, and supply chain management for diverse industries. The company has benefited from increased data center and AI infrastructure spending. Recent market activity shows shares advancing amid raised annual forecasts linked to these end markets, with upcoming quarterly results anticipated to provide further updates. Performance reflects steady execution across a diversified customer base, supporting resilience compared to more concentrated peers. Over recent weeks, sentiment has remained constructive on JBL's scale and ability to capture broad technology hardware demand.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions receive placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, enabling users to match approaches to specific risk tolerances and objectives. The platform highlights bots with varying success rates and trade volumes to illustrate potential outcomes under different scenarios. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed metrics and configuration options.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Fabrinet (FN) and Jabil (JBL) both participate in technology hardware manufacturing yet pursue distinct models. FN concentrates on high-precision optical and electro-mechanical components for networking and computing applications, creating higher margin potential but greater exposure to single-segment cycles. JBL maintains a diversified electronics manufacturing services platform spanning multiple verticals, which supports steadier revenue streams at typically lower margins. Recent momentum favors FN's optical focus amid datacom expansion, while JBL's broader positioning has driven forecast increases tied to data center growth. Risk factors differ accordingly: FN faces tighter supply dynamics in specialized components, whereas JBL contends with broader competitive and macroeconomic pressures. Market sentiment reflects FN's premium valuation for growth and JBL's appeal for scale and diversification within the same AI infrastructure theme.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, stability metrics, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to Fabrinet (FN) over Jabil (JBL). FN's specialized optical exposure aligns more directly with sustained high-performance computing and datacom catalysts, supporting stronger recent momentum and earnings beats. JBL's diversified model provides resilience and upcoming earnings visibility, yet its broader exposure introduces additional variables. The assessment remains probabilistic and subject to evolving market conditions, earnings outcomes, and supply dynamics rather than a definitive ranking.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FN vs. JBL commentary
Jul 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FN is a StrongBuy and JBL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FN: $499.61 vs. JBL: $341.30)
Brand notoriety: FN and JBL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FN: 64% vs. JBL: 82%
Market capitalization -- FN: $17.9B vs. JBL: $35.76B
FN [@Electronic Components] is valued at $17.9B. JBL’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $35.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $202.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $14.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJBL’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JBL’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the long-term than JBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JBL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • JBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JBL is a better buy in the short-term than FN.

Price Growth

FN (@Electronic Components) experienced а -12.01% price change this week, while JBL (@Electronic Components) price change was -8.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

FN is expected to report earnings on Aug 24, 2026.

JBL is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-2.80% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JBL($35.8B) has a higher market cap than FN($17.9B). FN (53.01) and JBL (50.84) have similar P/E ratio . JBL YTD gains are higher at: 49.761 vs. FN (9.737). JBL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.99B vs. FN (510M). JBL has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. FN (945M). FN has less debt than JBL: FN (4.43M) vs JBL (4.39B). JBL has higher revenues than FN: JBL (32.7B) vs FN (4.24B).
FNJBLFN / JBL
Capitalization17.9B35.8B50%
EBITDA510M1.99B26%
Gain YTD9.73749.76120%
P/E Ratio53.0150.84104%
Revenue4.24B32.7B13%
Total Cash945M1.06B89%
Total Debt4.43M4.39B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FN vs JBL: Fundamental Ratings
FN
JBL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5557
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
303
SMR RATING
1..100
4619
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
485
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1329
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5013

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FN's Valuation (60) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JBL (79). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to JBL’s over the last 12 months.

JBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (30). This means that JBL’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

JBL's SMR Rating (19) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (46). This means that JBL’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

JBL's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FN (48). This means that JBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FN’s over the last 12 months.

FN's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as JBL (29). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to JBL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNJBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
JBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRU112.951.88
+1.69%
Prudential Financial
EDUC1.54N/A
N/A
Educational Development Corp
DAKT19.53N/A
N/A
Daktronics
LENZ5.82N/A
N/A
LENZ Therapeutics
BBWI21.96-0.41
-1.83%
Bath & Body Works

FN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been closely correlated with CLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FN jumps, then CLS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FN
1D Price
Change %
FN100%
-8.69%
CLS - FN
66%
Closely correlated
-7.03%
JBL - FN
64%
Loosely correlated
-9.07%
GLW - FN
64%
Loosely correlated
-10.81%
BHE - FN
57%
Loosely correlated
-9.35%
FLEX - FN
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More