JETS
Price
$32.03
Change
-$0.38 (-1.17%)
Updated
Jul 10, 11:54 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
917.23M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XT
Price
$82.09
Change
-$0.55 (-0.67%)
Updated
Jul 10, 12:05 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.92B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

JETS vs XT

JETS vs XT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) vs. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT)

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) offers concentrated exposure to the global airline industry, tracking a specialized index of passenger airlines, aircraft manufacturers, airports, and related services, while iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) provides diversified access to global companies developing or utilizing exponential technologies across multiple sectors.
  • JETS maintains approximately 50 holdings with a heavier weighting toward U.S. passenger carriers, resulting in higher sector concentration in industrials, whereas XT holds around 195 securities with broad representation in information technology, healthcare, and other innovation-driven areas.
  • The expense ratio for JETS stands at 0.60%, reflecting its niche thematic focus, compared to XT’s lower 0.46% fee, which supports cost efficiency in a broader technology-oriented strategy.
  • JETS is a passively managed, non-diversified fund tied to air travel demand cycles, while XT follows a market-cap-weighted index emphasizing companies positioned for technological disruption and market creation.
  • Structural differences position JETS for investors seeking pure-play airline sector exposure and XT for those targeting long-term innovation and exponential growth themes across developed and emerging markets.
  • Liquidity profiles differ notably, with JETS typically exhibiting higher average daily trading volume suited to sector-specific tactical allocations, and XT offering steady institutional-grade access to a wider technology universe.

Introduction

Investors evaluating thematic equity exposure often weigh specialized sector funds against broader innovation-driven strategies. U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) do not compete directly; instead, they represent distinct approaches—one anchored in the cyclical airline industry and the other in forward-looking exponential technologies. Comparing these exchange-traded funds (ETFs) highlights differences in diversification, cost, and alignment with macroeconomic or technological trends, helping investors match structural characteristics to specific portfolio objectives.

U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) Overview

U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) seeks to track the performance of the U.S. Global Jets Index, which comprises U.S. and international passenger airlines, aircraft manufacturers, airports, terminal services companies, and airline-related internet media and services firms. The fund holds approximately 50 securities and employs a passive indexing methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain alignment with the underlying index. Top holdings typically include major carriers such as American Airlines, United Airlines, Southwest Airlines, and Delta Air Lines, which together account for a significant portion of assets. Sector allocation centers heavily on industrials, with smaller exposures to consumer cyclical and technology areas. The expense ratio is 0.60%. As a non-diversified fund, JETS features concentrated risk tied to airline operations, fuel costs, and travel demand, distinguishing it through its pure-play focus on air transportation infrastructure and services.

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) Overview

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index, composed of developed and emerging market companies that produce or use exponential technologies with the potential to displace existing models and create new markets. The ETF maintains roughly 195 holdings and follows a passive, market-capitalization-weighted approach with regular index reconstitution. Holdings span information technology, healthcare, consumer discretionary, and other innovation sectors, providing broad diversification across global innovators. The expense ratio is 0.46%. XT’s structure emphasizes companies at the forefront of technological advancement, including those in artificial intelligence, robotics, and advanced materials, without the concentration risks associated with narrower industry mandates.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The airline sector underpinning JETS remains sensitive to fuel price fluctuations, regulatory changes in aviation, global economic growth, and shifts in consumer travel patterns. Capital flows into air travel infrastructure have historically responded to post-pandemic recovery dynamics and supply-chain normalization in aircraft manufacturing. In contrast, the exponential technologies theme driving XT benefits from ongoing advancements in digital infrastructure, research and development spending, and cross-industry adoption of disruptive innovations. Macroeconomic drivers such as interest rate environments, geopolitical stability, and corporate capital expenditure cycles influence both areas differently—airline profitability often correlates with economic expansion, while exponential technology firms may demonstrate resilience through productivity gains regardless of traditional business cycles. Sector risks include regulatory hurdles for aviation and rapid obsolescence within technology segments.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, JETS has shown sensitivity to sector rotation favoring cyclical industrials during periods of economic expansion and improved travel metrics, with volatility influenced by commodity trends and geopolitical developments affecting fuel and demand. XT has exhibited positioning aligned with growth-oriented technology rotations, demonstrating relative stability through diversification across multiple exponential themes and lower correlation to traditional economic indicators. Relative performance has reflected differences in earnings cycles, with airline holdings responding to capacity utilization metrics and technology components benefiting from innovation-driven revenue expansion. Volatility profiles differ, with the concentrated airline exposure in JETS contributing to sharper swings compared to the broader holdings base of XT during macroeconomic shifts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and alignment with sustained innovation momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) with moderate probability. Its lower expense ratio, broader holdings base, and exposure to multiple high-growth technology themes provide a more resilient positioning relative to the concentrated cyclical risks inherent in U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS), though both remain suitable depending on an investor’s specific sector outlook and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
JETS vs. XT commentary
Jul 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JETS is a Hold and XT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XT has more net assets: 3.92B vs. JETS (917M). JETS (15.461) and XT (15.221) have matching annual dividend yield . JETS was incepted earlier than XT: JETS (11 years) vs XT (11 years). XT (0.46) has a lower expense ratio than JETS (0.60). XT has a higher turnover JETS (38.00) vs JETS (38.00).
JETSXTJETS / XT
Gain YTD15.46115.221102%
Net Assets917M3.92B23%
Total Expense Ratio0.600.46130%
Turnover38.0043.0088%
Yield0.700.9772%
Fund Existence11 years11 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
JETSXT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
JETS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCIHX18.730.08
+0.43%
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P
AMPFX44.39N/A
N/A
American Funds AMCAP F-1
NFEPX23.58N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst
TAINX28.41N/A
N/A
Transamerica International Equity R6
ALGZX23.02N/A
N/A
Alger Responsible Investing Z

JETS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JETS has been closely correlated with DAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JETS jumps, then DAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JETS
1D Price
Change %
JETS100%
+1.95%
DAL - JETS
90%
Closely correlated
+2.21%
LUV - JETS
83%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
CPA - JETS
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
AIR - JETS
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
VLRS - JETS
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
More

XT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XT has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XT jumps, then STM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XT
1D Price
Change %
XT100%
N/A
STM - XT
85%
Closely correlated
+4.16%
KEYS - XT
77%
Closely correlated
+1.55%
SEIC - XT
72%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
INTU - XT
69%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
FIVN - XT
67%
Closely correlated
+3.02%
More