Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLVZX vs RMFCX
JLVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts JLVZX vs RMFCX
JLVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLVZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. JLVZX (4.95B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than JLVZX: RMFCX (1.15) vs JLVZX (0.52). JLVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: JLVZX (18 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). JLVZX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). JLVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 185.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). JLVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: JLVZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). JLVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.99 vs. RMFCX (4.75). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.61 vs. JLVZX (26.64).
| JLVZX | RMFCX | JLVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.91 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.322 | 8.539 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.95B | 117B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.15 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.99 | 4.75 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.01 | 35.38 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.64 | 35.61 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.86 | 94.16 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement