Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JLVZX vs RMFCX
JLVZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts JLVZX vs RMFCX
JLVZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JLVZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLVZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. JLVZX (5.07B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than JLVZX: RMFCX (1.15) vs JLVZX (0.53). JLVZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: JLVZX (18 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). JLVZX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). JLVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 185.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). JLVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: JLVZX (0) vs RMFCX (250). JLVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.12 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. JLVZX (29.26).
| JLVZX | RMFCX | JLVZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.91 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.91 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.624 | 10.454 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.07B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.15 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.12 | 9.14 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.21 | 38.82 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.26 | 36.70 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.58 | 92.27 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers