KBCSY
Price
$59.19
Change
-$0.92 (-1.53%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
47.03B
UNCFF
Price
$77.34
Change
-$1.75 (-2.21%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
118.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

KBCSY vs UNCFF

Header iconKBCSY vs UNCFF Comparison
Open Charts KBCSY vs UNCFFBanner chart's image
KBC Group SA
Price$59.19
Change-$0.92 (-1.53%)
Volume$17.23K
Capitalization47.03B
UniCredito Spa
Price$77.34
Change-$1.75 (-2.21%)
Volume$1.18K
Capitalization118.6B
KBCSY vs UNCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KBCSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KBCSY vs. UNCFF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KBCSY is a Buy and UNCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (KBCSY: $59.19 vs. UNCFF: $77.34)
Brand notoriety: KBCSY and UNCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KBCSY: 48% vs. UNCFF: 42%
Market capitalization -- KBCSY: $47.03B vs. UNCFF: $118.6B
KBCSY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.03B. UNCFF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $118.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KBCSY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUNCFF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • KBCSY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UNCFF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, KBCSY is a better buy in the long-term than UNCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KBCSY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNCFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KBCSY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UNCFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UNCFF is a better buy in the short-term than KBCSY.

Price Growth

KBCSY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.80% price change this week, while UNCFF (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNCFF($119B) has a higher market cap than KBCSY($47B). KBCSY has higher P/E ratio than UNCFF: KBCSY (11.69) vs UNCFF (10.02). UNCFF YTD gains are higher at: 93.274 vs. KBCSY (59.442). KBCSY has less debt than UNCFF: KBCSY (26.4B) vs UNCFF (128B). UNCFF has higher revenues than KBCSY: UNCFF (26.7B) vs KBCSY (11.6B).
KBCSYUNCFFKBCSY / UNCFF
Capitalization47B119B39%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD59.44293.27464%
P/E Ratio11.6910.02117%
Revenue11.6B26.7B43%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt26.4B128B21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KBCSY vs UNCFF: Fundamental Ratings
KBCSY
UNCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3187
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
154
SMR RATING
1..100
64
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4039
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2813
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KBCSY's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as UNCFF (70). This means that KBCSY’s stock grew similarly to UNCFF’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as KBCSY (15). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to KBCSY’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as KBCSY (6). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to KBCSY’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as KBCSY (40). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to KBCSY’s over the last 12 months.

UNCFF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as KBCSY (28). This means that UNCFF’s stock grew similarly to KBCSY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KBCSYUNCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KBCSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NTIC7.450.01
+0.13%
Northern Technologies International Corp
DXPE124.18-1.22
-0.97%
DXP Enterprises
XNET6.68-0.07
-1.04%
Xunlei Limited
AUR5.72-0.10
-1.72%
Aurora Innovation
WHLR1.51-0.03
-1.95%
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust Inc

KBCSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KBCSY has been loosely correlated with BNPQY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KBCSY jumps, then BNPQY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KBCSY
1D Price
Change %
KBCSY100%
-1.54%
BNPQY - KBCSY
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
ISNPY - KBCSY
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
HBAN - KBCSY
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
SCGLY - KBCSY
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
TFC - KBCSY
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
More

UNCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNCFF has been loosely correlated with ISNPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNCFF jumps, then ISNPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNCFF
1D Price
Change %
UNCFF100%
-2.21%
ISNPY - UNCFF
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.94%
CRZBY - UNCFF
39%
Loosely correlated
-6.42%
BKRIY - UNCFF
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
MDIBY - UNCFF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
KBCSY - UNCFF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
More