Ad is loading...
KCSIX vs NAESX
KCSIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts KCSIX vs NAESX
Knights of Columbus Small Cap I
Price$11.64
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.98M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$103.01
Change-$0.12 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
KCSIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCSIX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCSIX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. KCSIX (140M). NAESX pays higher dividends than KCSIX: NAESX (1.39) vs KCSIX (0.54). KCSIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: KCSIX (10 years) vs NAESX (65 years). KCSIX (0.98) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). KCSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCSIX: NAESX (3000) vs KCSIX (25000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.19 vs. KCSIX (-6.90). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 75.06 vs. KCSIX (47.92).
| KCSIX | NAESX | KCSIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.17 | 576% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.17 | 576% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.593 | -10.465 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 3000 | 833% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140M | 143B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.39 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.90 | 0.19 | -3,626% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.52 | 10.16 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.92 | 75.06 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.61 | 81.51 | 19% |