Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVIX vs RMEBX
KCVIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCVIX vs RMEBX
KCVIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. KCVIX (367M). KCVIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: KCVIX (1.13) vs RMEBX (0.99). KCVIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: KCVIX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than KCVIX (0.75). KCVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCVIX: RMEBX (250) vs KCVIX (25000). KCVIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.42 vs. RMEBX (8.96). KCVIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.73 vs. RMEBX (36.13).
| KCVIX | RMEBX | KCVIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.595 | 9.416 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 367M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.99 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.42 | 8.96 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.99 | 32.63 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.73 | 36.13 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.67 | 90.64 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement