Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVIX vs RMEBX
KCVIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCVIX vs RMEBX
KCVIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVIX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. KCVIX (381M). KCVIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: KCVIX (1.17) vs RMEBX (1.04). KCVIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: KCVIX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than KCVIX (0.75). KCVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCVIX: RMEBX (250) vs KCVIX (25000). KCVIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.74 vs. RMEBX (9.11). KCVIX return over 5 years is better than : 45.41 vs. RMEBX (34.74).
| KCVIX | RMEBX | KCVIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.568 | 6.308 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 381M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.04 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.74 | 9.11 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.80 | 34.37 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.41 | 34.74 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 161.89 | 94.33 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement