Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVIX vs RMFCX
KCVIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts KCVIX vs RMFCX
KCVIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. KCVIX (367M). RMFCX (1.15) and KCVIX (1.13) have matching dividends . KCVIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: KCVIX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than KCVIX (0.75). KCVIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCVIX: RMFCX (250) vs KCVIX (25000). KCVIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.42 vs. RMFCX (9.09). KCVIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.73 vs. RMFCX (37.08).
| KCVIX | RMFCX | KCVIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.595 | 9.496 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 367M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.15 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.42 | 9.09 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.99 | 33.16 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.73 | 37.08 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 154.67 | 92.36 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement