KGLDF
Price
$0.59
Change
+$0.01 (+1.72%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
25.31M
NIOVF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGLDF vs NIOVF

Header iconKGLDF vs NIOVF Comparison
Open Charts KGLDF vs NIOVFBanner chart's image
King Global Ventures
Price$0.59
Change+$0.01 (+1.72%)
Volume$18.3K
Capitalization25.31M
Plato Gold
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$70K
Capitalization4.99M
KGLDF vs NIOVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIOVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGLDF vs. NIOVF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGLDF is a Hold and NIOVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (KGLDF: $0.59 vs. NIOVF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: KGLDF and NIOVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGLDF: 52% vs. NIOVF: 168%
Market capitalization -- KGLDF: $25.31M vs. NIOVF: $4.99M
KGLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $25.31M. NIOVF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGLDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNIOVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KGLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NIOVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KGLDF and NIOVF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGLDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIOVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGLDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NIOVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both KGLDF and NIOVF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

KGLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.05% price change this week, while NIOVF (@Precious Metals) price change was -24.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4218.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.84% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGLDF($25.3M) has a higher market cap than NIOVF($4.99M). KGLDF YTD gains are higher at: 110.264 vs. NIOVF (19.048). NIOVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -176.05K vs. KGLDF (-2.92M). KGLDF has more cash in the bank: 1.57M vs. NIOVF (62.6K). KGLDF (0) and NIOVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
KGLDFNIOVFKGLDF / NIOVF
Capitalization25.3M4.99M507%
EBITDA-2.92M-176.05K1,657%
Gain YTD110.26419.048579%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.57M62.6K2,506%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGLDF vs NIOVF: Fundamental Ratings
KGLDF
NIOVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8684
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
9995
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4237
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NIOVF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (64). This means that NIOVF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

KGLDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as NIOVF (100). This means that KGLDF’s stock grew similarly to NIOVF’s over the last 12 months.

NIOVF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (99). This means that NIOVF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

NIOVF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (42). This means that NIOVF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

NIOVF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KGLDF (100). This means that NIOVF’s stock grew similarly to KGLDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGLDFNIOVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NIOVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RELL9.87-0.03
-0.30%
Richardson Electronics Ltd
ULH26.21-0.22
-0.83%
Universal Logistics Holdings
BRN1.18-0.01
-0.84%
Barnwell Industries
BCC88.05-0.80
-0.90%
Boise Cascade Company
FWONA89.87-1.46
-1.60%
Liberty Media Corp

KGLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGLDF and NIOVF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGLDF and NIOVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGLDF
1D Price
Change %
KGLDF100%
N/A
NIOVF - KGLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-26.14%
JAGGF - KGLDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
KNTNF - KGLDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
JUPGF - KGLDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.25%
KDKGF - KGLDF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.73%
More

NIOVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIOVF and GPTRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIOVF and GPTRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIOVF
1D Price
Change %
NIOVF100%
-26.14%
GPTRF - NIOVF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
KGLDF - NIOVF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USAU - NIOVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
GSTMF - NIOVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.77%
AIRRF - NIOVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.70%
More