KGRN
Price
$23.94
Change
+$0.11 (+0.46%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
52.1M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KWEB
Price
$26.66
Change
-$0.03 (-0.11%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
5.3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KGRN vs KWEB

KGRN vs KWEB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) vs. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB)

Key Takeaways

  • KGRN provides targeted exposure to Chinese companies in clean technology and renewables, tracking the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index with a focus on energy efficiency, alternative energy, sustainable water, and pollution prevention.
  • KWEB offers concentrated exposure to Chinese internet and technology firms, tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index with heavy weighting toward e-commerce, social media, and cloud services leaders.
  • KGRN maintains a higher expense ratio of 0.79% compared to KWEB’s 0.69%, reflecting differences in index complexity and liquidity profiles.
  • KGRN typically holds 48–53 securities with significant allocations to electric vehicle manufacturers and utilities, while KWEB holds around 34 names dominated by consumer internet platforms.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed, physically replicated index funds from the same issuer, but they represent distinct thematic bets within China’s equity market rather than direct competitors.
  • Structural differences in sector concentration create divergent risk profiles: KGRN ties more closely to energy transition policy, whereas KWEB aligns with domestic consumption and digital economy trends.

Introduction

Investors seeking China exposure often weigh thematic opportunities in clean energy against the digital economy. KGRN and KWEB both target Chinese equities but pursue different segments of the market. They do not compete directly; instead, they offer complementary yet distinct strategies for investors interested in China’s long-term structural shifts toward sustainability and technological self-reliance. This comparison highlights how each fund’s index methodology, holdings concentration, and cost structure shape its role in a diversified portfolio.

KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF (KGRN) Overview

KGRN is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the MSCI China IMI Environment 10/40 Index. The index selects Chinese companies deriving at least 50% of revenue from environmentally beneficial products and services across four themes: energy efficiency, alternative energy, sustainable water, and pollution prevention. The fund typically holds 48–53 securities and maintains an expense ratio of 0.79%. Top holdings as of late August 2026 include BYD Co Ltd, NIO Inc, Li Auto Inc, XPeng Inc, and China Yangtze Power Co Ltd, reflecting substantial exposure to electric vehicles and power generation. Sector allocations emphasize consumer cyclical and industrials alongside utilities. The fund employs full physical replication and rebalances according to the index methodology, providing a focused vehicle for the energy transition theme.

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) Overview

KWEB is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. The index comprises China-based companies whose primary businesses center on internet and internet-related technology, with securities listed on exchanges including Hong Kong, NASDAQ, and NYSE. The fund typically holds around 34 names and carries an expense ratio of 0.69%. Top holdings as of late August 2026 include Tencent Holdings Ltd, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd, PDD Holdings Inc, Meituan, and NetEase Inc. Sector exposure concentrates in consumer discretionary and communication services. The fund uses physical replication and follows the index’s free-float market-capitalization weighting with periodic rebalancing, delivering concentrated access to China’s digital economy leaders.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within China’s evolving policy landscape, where government priorities include carbon neutrality targets by 2060 and technological self-reliance outlined in successive Five-Year Plans. The clean technology sector benefits from expanding renewable energy infrastructure and electric vehicle adoption, while the internet sector gains from middle-class consumption growth and advancements in artificial intelligence and cloud computing. Macro drivers such as interest rate expectations, regulatory developments in data security and antitrust, and global supply chain shifts influence capital flows into both themes. Risks include geopolitical tensions, domestic economic cycles, and sector-specific regulatory interventions that can affect company valuations across the broader Chinese equity market.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, KGRN has exhibited sensitivity to policy support for renewables and commodity price movements tied to battery materials. KWEB has shown greater responsiveness to consumer spending trends, e-commerce volumes, and earnings momentum among platform companies. Volatility differences arise from holdings concentration: KWEB’s narrower set of names can amplify sector rotation effects, while KGRN’s inclusion of utilities provides a modest stabilizing element during periods of energy transition emphasis. Relative positioning depends on whether investors prioritize exposure to the energy transition or digital consumption themes amid shifting macroeconomic conditions.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, KWEB currently presents a modestly more favorable profile for the AI screener due to its lower expense ratio, established liquidity, and alignment with broad digital economy momentum. While KGRN offers compelling thematic purity in clean technology, the combination of cost efficiency and diversification within the internet sector gives KWEB a probabilistic edge in relative positioning under prevailing market conditions. This assessment reflects observable fund attributes rather than short-term price movements.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
KGRN vs. KWEB commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGRN is a Hold and KWEB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 5.3B vs. KGRN (52.1M). KGRN has a higher annual dividend yield than KWEB: KGRN (-11.300) vs KWEB (-21.703). KGRN was incepted earlier than KWEB: KGRN (9 years) vs KWEB (13 years). KWEB (0.70) has a lower expense ratio than KGRN (0.79). KWEB has a higher turnover KGRN (35.00) vs KGRN (35.00).
KGRNKWEBKGRN / KWEB
Gain YTD-11.300-21.70352%
Net Assets52.1M5.3B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.790.70113%
Turnover35.0045.0078%
Yield0.947.4313%
Fund Existence9 years13 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGRNKWEB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KGRN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KWEB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
URNJ26.101.92
+7.94%
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
ETG23.990.11
+0.46%
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund
MARM34.430.03
+0.09%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Mar
AIPO31.23N/A
N/A
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF
UCIB37.07-0.09
-0.25%
UBS ETRACS BgCstMtCdy(CMCI)TtlRetETNSerB

KGRN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGRN has been closely correlated with XPEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KGRN jumps, then XPEV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGRN
1D Price
Change %
KGRN100%
+0.46%
XPEV - KGRN
70%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
NIO - KGRN
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
LI - KGRN
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
NIU - KGRN
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
KC - KGRN
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
More

KWEB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KWEB
1D Price
Change %
KWEB100%
-0.11%
BABA - KWEB
89%
Closely correlated
-8.57%
JD - KWEB
83%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
BILI - KWEB
82%
Closely correlated
+2.40%
BIDU - KWEB
80%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
KC - KWEB
79%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
More