Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLGAX vs RGACX
KLGAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLGAX vs RGACX
KLGAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLGAX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLGAX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. KLGAX (953M). KLGAX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLGAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLGAX (20 years) vs RGACX (24 years). KLGAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). KLGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLGAX: RGACX (250) vs KLGAX (15000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.70 vs. KLGAX (-1.97). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.51 vs. KLGAX (-1.15).
| KLGAX | RGACX | KLGAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.93 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.93 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.419 | 8.560 | 5% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 250 | 6,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 953M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.97 | -1.70 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.25 | 42.09 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.15 | 10.51 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.55 | 99.22 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement