KRG vs SAFT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KRG is a StrongBuy and SAFT is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KRG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- KRG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KRG’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KRG’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SAFT’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
KRG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.31% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.55%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +2.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
KRG is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.
SAFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.27% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+2.48% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| KRG | SAFT | KRG / SAFT | |
| Capitalization | 4.76B | 1.22B | 391% |
| EBITDA | 584M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.772 | -3.679 | 238% |
| P/E Ratio | 96.32 | 63.23 | 152% |
| Revenue | 823M | 926M | 89% |
| Total Cash | 36.4M | 518M | 7% |
| Total Debt | 3.06B | 49.8M | 6,141% |
KRG | SAFT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SAFT's Valuation (22) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRG (98) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew significantly faster than KRG’s over the last 12 months.
KRG's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (62) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KRG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
SAFT's SMR Rating (76) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as KRG (89) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to KRG’s over the last 12 months.
KRG's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SAFT (54) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KRG’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
KRG's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAFT (98) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KRG’s stock grew significantly faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.
| KRG | SAFT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 5 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 53% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SECT | 52.34 | 0.37 | +0.71% |
| Main Sector Rotation ETF | |||
| XVOL | 20.45 | N/A | N/A |
| Acruence Active Hedge US Equity ETF | |||
| IBMN | 26.67 | N/A | -0.02% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bd ETF | |||
| DFE | 65.73 | -0.42 | -0.64% |
| WisdomTree Europe SmallCap Dividend ETF | |||
| TWM | 50.38 | -2.02 | -3.85% |
| ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | |||
KRG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRG has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KRG jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.
SAFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been loosely correlated with UFCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then UFCS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAFT | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| UFCS - SAFT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| CNA - SAFT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| L - SAFT | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| CINF - SAFT | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| THG - SAFT | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
More | ||||