Advertisement
KRLTF vs NTR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KRLTF is a Hold and NTR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KRLTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNTR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- KRLTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NTR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KRLTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KRLTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NTR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
KRLTF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NTR (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -6.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -1.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
NTR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Agricultural (-1.56% weekly)The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
| KRLTF | NTR | KRLTF / NTR | |
| Capitalization | 4.95M | 27.2B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -623K | 4.99B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 41.287 | 28.770 | 144% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 15.08 | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 26B | - |
| Total Cash | 1.05M | 775M | 0% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 13.6B | - |
KRLTF | NTR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTR's Valuation (26) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KRLTF (64) in the null industry. This means that NTR’s stock grew somewhat faster than KRLTF’s over the last 12 months.
NTR's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as KRLTF (100) in the null industry. This means that NTR’s stock grew similarly to KRLTF’s over the last 12 months.
NTR's SMR Rating (80) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as KRLTF (91) in the null industry. This means that NTR’s stock grew similarly to KRLTF’s over the last 12 months.
NTR's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as KRLTF (51) in the null industry. This means that NTR’s stock grew similarly to KRLTF’s over the last 12 months.
NTR's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as KRLTF (100) in the null industry. This means that NTR’s stock grew similarly to KRLTF’s over the last 12 months.
| KRLTF | NTR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 22 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 70% |
Advertisement
KRLTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KRLTF and KPLUF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KRLTF and KPLUF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KRLTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRLTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| KPLUF - KRLTF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ICL - KRLTF | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.67% | ||
| BIOX - KRLTF | 2% Poorly correlated | -3.37% | ||
| NTR - KRLTF | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
| KPLUY - KRLTF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NTR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTR has been closely correlated with CF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTR jumps, then CF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTR | 100% | -2.41% | ||
| CF - NTR | 67% Closely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| MOS - NTR | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| CTVA - NTR | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| KPLUY - NTR | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| YARIY - NTR | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
More | ||||