Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KTCAX vs SLMCX
KTCAX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts KTCAX vs SLMCX
KTCAX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KTCAX vs. SLMCX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTCAX is a Hold and SLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 29.9B vs. KTCAX (2.56B). KTCAX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . KTCAX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: KTCAX (78 years) vs SLMCX (43 years). SLMCX (1.16) is less costly to investors than KTCAX (0.88). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. KTCAX (22.00). KTCAX (6%) and SLMCX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. KTCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLMCX: KTCAX (1000) vs SLMCX (2000). SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 103.57 vs. KTCAX (39.66). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 99.86 vs. KTCAX (47.24).
| KTCAX | SLMCX | KTCAX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.16 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.16 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 78 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.686 | 59.221 | 43% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 29.9B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.66 | 103.57 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.56 | 143.56 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.24 | 99.86 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 273.69 | 367.84 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers