Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KTCIX vs SLMCX
KTCIX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts KTCIX vs SLMCX
KTCIX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KTCIX vs. SLMCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTCIX is a Hold and SLMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 30.1B vs. KTCIX (2.55B). KTCIX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . KTCIX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: KTCIX (24 years) vs SLMCX (43 years). SLMCX (1.16) is less costly to investors than KTCIX (0.68). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. KTCIX (22.00). SLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than KTCIX: SLMCX (2000) vs KTCIX (1000000). SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 94.78 vs. KTCIX (39.60). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 90.45 vs. KTCIX (56.84).
| KTCIX | SLMCX | KTCIX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.16 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.16 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.383 | 53.676 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.55B | 30.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.60 | 94.78 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.43 | 135.07 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.84 | 90.45 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 319.25 | 351.55 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement