Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KWEB vs MCHS
KWEB vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts KWEB vs MCHS
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$34.00
Change-$0.85 (-2.44%)
Volume$21.57M
Net Assets6.5B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$28.69
Change-$0.70 (-2.38%)
Volume$302
Net Assets2.3M
KWEB vs MCHS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KWEB vs. MCHS commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWEB is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 6.5B vs. MCHS (2.3M). KWEB has a higher annual dividend yield than MCHS: KWEB (16.279) vs MCHS (12.639). KWEB was incepted earlier than MCHS: KWEB (12 years) vs MCHS (1 year). KWEB (0.70) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover KWEB (32.00) vs KWEB (32.00).
| KWEB | MCHS | KWEB / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 16.279 | 12.639 | 129% |
| Net Assets | 6.5B | 2.3M | 282,118% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.89 | 79% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 115.31 | 28% |
| Yield | 3.09 | 5.06 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| KWEB | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| STPZ | 53.38 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | |||
| SAMT | 32.68 | -0.13 | -0.41% |
| Strategas Macro Thematic Opp ETF | |||
| RPHS | 10.10 | -0.10 | -0.98% |
| Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF | |||
| OBOR | 23.06 | -0.28 | -1.20% |
| KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road ETF | |||
| REGL | 80.44 | -1.24 | -1.52% |
| ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Arst | |||
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | -2.44% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | -3.22% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| WB - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
More | ||||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | -2.38% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 54% Loosely correlated | -3.13% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.08% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 46% Loosely correlated | -5.27% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 37% Loosely correlated | -4.02% |