Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KWEB vs MCHS
KWEB vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts KWEB vs MCHS
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Price$37.28
Change-$0.56 (-1.48%)
Volume$157.07K
Net Assets9.19B
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
Price$32.53
Change-$0.10 (-0.31%)
Volume$100
Net Assets2.66M
KWEB vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KWEB vs. MCHS commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWEB is a Hold and MCHS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 9.19B vs. MCHS (2.66M). KWEB (29.412) and MCHS (28.093) have matching annual dividend yield . KWEB was incepted earlier than MCHS: KWEB (12 years) vs MCHS (2 years). KWEB (0.70) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). MCHS has a higher turnover KWEB (54.00) vs KWEB (54.00).
| KWEB | MCHS | KWEB / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | 29.412 | 28.093 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 9.19B | 2.66M | 345,376% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.89 | 79% |
| Turnover | 54.00 | 115.31 | 47% |
| Yield | 2.58 | 4.17 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| KWEB | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| KC - KWEB | 79% Closely correlated | +1.97% | ||
More | ||||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHS has been loosely correlated with BZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHS jumps, then BZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | -1.46% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.22% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.05% |