Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KWEB vs MCHS
KWEB vs MCHS Comparison
Open Charts KWEB vs MCHS
KWEB vs MCHS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KWEB vs. MCHS commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWEB is a Hold and MCHS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 5.31B vs. MCHS (20.5M). MCHS has a higher annual dividend yield than KWEB: MCHS (31.479) vs KWEB (-20.675). KWEB was incepted earlier than MCHS: KWEB (13 years) vs MCHS (3 years). KWEB (0.70) has a lower expense ratio than MCHS (0.89). KWEB (45.00) and MCHS (43.98) have matching turnover.
| KWEB | MCHS | KWEB / MCHS | |
| Gain YTD | -20.675 | 31.479 | -66% |
| Net Assets | 5.31B | 20.5M | 25,878% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.89 | 79% |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 43.98 | 102% |
| Yield | 7.43 | 2.89 | 257% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| KWEB | MCHS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 18 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| URNM | 54.56 | 0.09 | +0.17% |
| Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | |||
| TSMY | 15.65 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| YieldMax TSM Option Inc Strat ETF | |||
| OCTP | 33.07 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Oct | |||
| GFEB | 44.79 | -0.04 | -0.09% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Feb | |||
| DFII | 11.51 | -0.09 | -0.74% |
| Ft Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF | |||
KWEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KWEB | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| BABA - KWEB | 89% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| JD - KWEB | 83% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| BILI - KWEB | 82% Closely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| BIDU - KWEB | 80% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| KC - KWEB | 79% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
More | ||||
MCHS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHS and ACMR have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHS and ACMR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHS | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| ACMR - MCHS | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.95% | ||
| ZH - MCHS | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| BZ - MCHS | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
| ATAT - MCHS | 1% Poorly correlated | +3.39% | ||
| YMM - MCHS | -0% Poorly correlated | -0.68% |