L
Price
$96.64
Change
-$0.89 (-0.91%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
20.05B
58 days until earnings call
NODK
Price
$13.34
Change
-$0.05 (-0.37%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
275.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs NODK

Header iconL vs NODK Comparison
Open Charts L vs NODKBanner chart's image
Loews
Price$96.64
Change-$0.89 (-0.91%)
Volume$770.46K
Capitalization20.05B
NI Holdings
Price$13.34
Change-$0.05 (-0.37%)
Volume$5.53K
Capitalization275.81M
L vs NODK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NODK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. NODK commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a StrongBuy and NODK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (L: $96.64 vs. NODK: $13.39)
Brand notoriety: L and NODK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 102% vs. NODK: 42%
Market capitalization -- L: $20.05B vs. NODK: $275.81M
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $20.05B. NODK’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $275.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $143B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $18.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNODK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NODK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than NODK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NODK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NODK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both L and NODK are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.17% price change this week, while NODK (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.22% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($20B) has a higher market cap than NODK($276M). NODK has higher P/E ratio than L: NODK (19.91) vs L (15.48). L YTD gains are higher at: 14.349 vs. NODK (-15.032). L has higher revenues than NODK: L (17.8B) vs NODK (310M).
LNODKL / NODK
Capitalization20B276M7,246%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.349-15.032-95%
P/E Ratio15.4819.9178%
Revenue17.8B310M5,742%
Total CashN/A199M-
Total Debt8.95BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs NODK: Fundamental Ratings
L
NODK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1513
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2597
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
33n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

L's Valuation (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as NODK (75) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to NODK’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for NODK (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than NODK’s over the last 12 months.

L's SMR Rating (97) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as NODK (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to NODK’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as NODK (57) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to NODK’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for NODK (97) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than NODK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LNODK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NODK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PURE0.090.01
+6.18%
PURE Bioscience
BLSFY79.054.05
+5.40%
Bluescope Steel, Ltd.
RBGLY15.420.11
+0.72%
Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc.
UHOIF14.21N/A
N/A
Ushio Inc.
LTHCF0.57-0.02
-3.13%
Lithium Ionic Corp.

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
-0.91%
HIG - L
85%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
CINF - L
84%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
CNA - L
82%
Closely correlated
-1.92%
ORI - L
81%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
THG - L
78%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
More

NODK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NODK has been loosely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NODK jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NODK
1D Price
Change %
NODK100%
-0.37%
BNT - NODK
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
HIPO - NODK
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
L - NODK
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
MCY - NODK
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
CNA - NODK
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
More