It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
L’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNODK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NODK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.17% price change this week, while NODK (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.99%.
L is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
L | NODK | L / NODK | |
Capitalization | 20B | 276M | 7,246% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 14.349 | -15.032 | -95% |
P/E Ratio | 15.48 | 19.91 | 78% |
Revenue | 17.8B | 310M | 5,742% |
Total Cash | N/A | 199M | - |
Total Debt | 8.95B | N/A | - |
L | NODK | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 33 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
L's Valuation (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as NODK (75) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to NODK’s over the last 12 months.
L's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for NODK (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than NODK’s over the last 12 months.
L's SMR Rating (97) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as NODK (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to NODK’s over the last 12 months.
L's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as NODK (57) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to NODK’s over the last 12 months.
L's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for NODK (97) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than NODK’s over the last 12 months.
L | NODK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago38% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago36% | 1 day ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago33% | 1 day ago62% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago55% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 10 days ago51% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago37% | 3 days ago49% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago49% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago58% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NODK has been loosely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NODK jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NODK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NODK | 100% | -0.37% | ||
BNT - NODK | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
HIPO - NODK | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
L - NODK | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
MCY - NODK | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
CNA - NODK | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.92% | ||
More |