NODK
Price
$15.15
Change
-$0.19 (-1.24%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
310.29M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UFCS
Price
$51.36
Change
-$0.69 (-1.33%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.32B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NODK vs UFCS

NODK vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NODK vs. UFCS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NODK is a StrongBuy and UFCS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (NODK: $15.15 vs. UFCS: $51.36)
Brand notoriety: NODK and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NODK: 46% vs. UFCS: 55%
Market capitalization -- NODK: $310.29M vs. UFCS: $1.32B
NODK [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $310.29M. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $135.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $13.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NODK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NODK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UFCS is a better buy in the long-term than NODK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NODK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NODK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NODK is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

NODK (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -4.42% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.46% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UFCS($1.32B) has a higher market cap than NODK($310M). NODK has higher P/E ratio than UFCS: NODK (119.09) vs UFCS (10.35). UFCS YTD gains are higher at: 42.692 vs. NODK (13.910). UFCS has more cash in the bank: 1.34B vs. NODK (189M). UFCS has higher revenues than NODK: UFCS (1.43B) vs NODK (273M).
NODKUFCSNODK / UFCS
Capitalization310M1.32B24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.91042.69233%
P/E Ratio119.0910.351,150%
Revenue273M1.43B19%
Total Cash189M1.34B14%
Total DebtN/A146M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NODK vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
NODK
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5175
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10029
SMR RATING
1..100
10060
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
650
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UFCS's Valuation (36) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NODK (90) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NODK’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for NODK (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew significantly faster than NODK’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (60) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NODK (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NODK’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as NODK (47) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to NODK’s over the last 12 months.

NODK's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UFCS (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that NODK’s stock grew somewhat faster than UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NODKUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NODK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UFCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFPWX65.460.54
+0.83%
Parnassus Value Equity Institutional
VTSNX181.960.14
+0.08%
Vanguard Total Intl Stock Index I
FGRSX47.13N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Intl Leaders R6
HLMSX19.55-0.13
-0.66%
Harding Loevner Intl Small Coms Inv
ANTGX11.59-0.08
-0.69%
American Century Non-US Intrs Val G

NODK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NODK has been loosely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NODK jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NODK
1D Price
Change %
NODK100%
-1.24%
BNT - NODK
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
BOW - NODK
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
DGICA - NODK
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
UFCS - NODK
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
STC - NODK
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More