Advertisement
NODK vs UFCS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NODK is a Hold and UFCS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NODK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NODK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UFCS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NODK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NODK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- UFCS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
NODK (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -2.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
UFCS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.15% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| NODK | UFCS | NODK / UFCS | |
| Capitalization | 312M | 1.36B | 23% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.962 | 47.303 | 32% |
| P/E Ratio | 40.32 | 9.84 | 410% |
| Revenue | 273M | 1.43B | 19% |
| Total Cash | 189M | 1.34B | 14% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 146M | - |
NODK | UFCS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UFCS's Valuation (40) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NODK (79) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NODK’s over the last 12 months.
UFCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for NODK (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew significantly faster than NODK’s over the last 12 months.
UFCS's SMR Rating (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NODK (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NODK’s over the last 12 months.
UFCS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as NODK (49) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to NODK’s over the last 12 months.
NODK's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (35) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that NODK’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.
| NODK | UFCS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 10 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 49% | 24 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XLSR | 66.05 | 0.27 | +0.42% |
| State Street® US Sector Rotation ETF | |||
| BASAX | 21.38 | 0.07 | +0.33% |
| Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Adv | |||
| SBMAX | 34.86 | 0.11 | +0.32% |
| ClearBridge Mid Cap A | |||
| FCVCX | 19.31 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value C | |||
| FWOAX | 21.34 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership A | |||
NODK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NODK has been loosely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NODK jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NODK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NODK | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| BNT - NODK | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| BOW - NODK | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| STC - NODK | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| DGICA - NODK | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UFCS - NODK | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||
UFCS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with DGICA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then DGICA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UFCS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFCS | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| DGICA - UFCS | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HIG - UFCS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| SAFT - UFCS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| CINF - UFCS | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| THG - UFCS | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||