L
Price
$110.56
Change
+$2.43 (+2.25%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
22.75B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PRA
Price
$24.65
Change
+$0.11 (+0.45%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.27B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs PRA

L vs PRA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. PRA commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a Buy and PRA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (L: $108.13 vs. PRA: $24.54)
Brand notoriety: L and PRA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 135% vs. PRA: 37%
Market capitalization -- L: $22.25B vs. PRA: $1.27B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $22.25B. PRA’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $126.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $12.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than PRA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PRA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both L and PRA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.14% price change this week, while PRA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

PRA is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.83% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($22.8B) has a higher market cap than PRA($1.27B). PRA has higher P/E ratio than L: PRA (19.48) vs L (13.76). L YTD gains are higher at: 2.795 vs. PRA (1.573). L has more cash in the bank: 7.51B vs. PRA (3.97B). PRA has less debt than L: PRA (433M) vs L (8.93B). L has higher revenues than PRA: L (18.2B) vs PRA (1.08B).
LPRAL / PRA
Capitalization22.8B1.27B1,792%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.7951.573178%
P/E Ratio13.7619.4871%
Revenue18.2B1.08B1,691%
Total Cash7.51B3.97B189%
Total Debt8.93B433M2,063%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs PRA: Fundamental Ratings
L
PRA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1484
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1298
SMR RATING
1..100
9387
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5979
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

L's Valuation (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRA (94) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRA (98) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's SMR Rating (87) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (93) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PRA (54) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to PRA’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PRA (79) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to PRA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LPRA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PRA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INVZ0.600.02
+3.30%
Innoviz Technologies Ltd
WAFU1.63N/A
-0.21%
Wah Fu Education Group Limited
LRN82.32-0.48
-0.58%
Stride
PHM125.62-1.34
-1.06%
Pultegroup
PFLT7.25-0.23
-3.07%
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+0.79%
HIG - L
86%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
CNA - L
80%
Closely correlated
+2.79%
AXS - L
76%
Closely correlated
+2.38%
CINF - L
72%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
TRV - L
71%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
More

PRA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRA has been loosely correlated with AXS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRA jumps, then AXS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRA
1D Price
Change %
PRA100%
-0.45%
AXS - PRA
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
MCY - PRA
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
TRV - PRA
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
SIGIP - PRA
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
L - PRA
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More