L
Price
$104.46
Change
-$0.47 (-0.45%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.59B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PRA
Price
$24.42
Change
+$0.44 (+1.83%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.23B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

L vs PRA

Header iconL vs PRA Comparison
Open Charts L vs PRABanner chart's image
L vs PRA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
L vs. PRA commentary
Jun 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is L is a StrongBuy and PRA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2026
Stock price -- (L: $104.93 vs. PRA: $23.98)
Brand notoriety: L and PRA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: L: 141% vs. PRA: 86%
Market capitalization -- L: $21.59B vs. PRA: $1.23B
L [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $21.59B. PRA’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $12.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

L’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • L’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than PRA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

L’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PRA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than PRA.

Price Growth

L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -3.76% price change this week, while PRA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -2.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +11.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

L is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

PRA is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+11.88% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($21.6B) has a higher market cap than PRA($1.23B). PRA has higher P/E ratio than L: PRA (19.03) vs L (13.35). L YTD gains are higher at: -0.247 vs. PRA (-0.745). PRA has less debt than L: PRA (433M) vs L (9.49B). L has higher revenues than PRA: L (18.2B) vs PRA (1.08B).
LPRAL / PRA
Capitalization21.6B1.23B1,756%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.247-0.74533%
P/E Ratio13.3519.0370%
Revenue18.2B1.08B1,691%
Total CashN/A3.97B-
Total Debt9.49B433M2,191%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
L vs PRA: Fundamental Ratings
L
PRA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7476
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
12100
SMR RATING
1..100
9287
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6082
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

L's Valuation (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRA (93) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRA (100) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's SMR Rating (87) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (92) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as L (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PRA (82) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to PRA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LPRA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PRA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTR3.830.04
+0.92%
Mesa Royalty Trust
MKL1787.48-2.19
-0.12%
Markel Group
ICUI130.33-1.31
-1.00%
ICU Medical
HSHP14.65-0.39
-2.59%
Himalaya Shipping Ltd
XGN4.82-0.53
-9.91%
Exagen

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+1.06%
HIG - L
86%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
CNA - L
80%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
AXS - L
76%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
CINF - L
72%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
TRV - L
70%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
More

PRA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRA has been loosely correlated with AXS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRA jumps, then AXS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PRA
1D Price
Change %
PRA100%
+0.63%
AXS - PRA
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
MCY - PRA
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
TRV - PRA
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
SAFT - PRA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
L - PRA
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
More