Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
LAFCX vs RMEBX
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.38
Change-$0.11 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.52
Change-$0.52 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. LAFCX (6.39B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMEBX (1.54) vs LAFCX (0.80). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFCX (28 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). LAFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.09 vs. RMEBX (21.12). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.89 vs. LAFCX (31.90).
| LAFCX | RMEBX | LAFCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.711 | 16.258 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.39B | 104B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.54 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.09 | 21.12 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.07 | 14.92 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.90 | 43.89 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.10 | 63.64 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...