Ad is loading...
LAFCX vs RMEBX
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$19.25
Change-$0.14 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.95
Change-$2.99 (-5.07%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 104B vs. LAFCX (6.32B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMEBX (1.54) vs LAFCX (0.80). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFCX (28 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). LAFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.33 vs. RMEBX (12.51). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.44 vs. LAFCX (24.90).
| LAFCX | RMEBX | LAFCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.018 | 11.313 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 104B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.54 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.33 | 12.51 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.34 | 13.70 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.90 | 39.44 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.19 | 60.50 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...