Ad is loading...
LAFCX vs RMEBX
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$19.56
Change-$0.32 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.23B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.54
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LAFCX (6.23B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMEBX (1.54) vs LAFCX (0.80). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMEBX (10.88) and LAFCX (10.68) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.75 vs. LAFCX (27.30).
| LAFCX | RMEBX | LAFCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.264 | 4.809 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.23B | 105B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.54 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.68 | 10.88 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.06 | 19.18 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.30 | 40.75 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.11 | 63.29 | 41% |