Ad is loading...
LAFCX vs RMEBX
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$18.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.87B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.29
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. LAFCX (5.87B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMEBX (1.21) vs LAFCX (0.86). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.24 vs. LAFCX (3.36). RMEBX (54.68) and LAFCX (53.90) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFCX | RMEBX | LAFCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.166 | 0.984 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.87B | 101B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.21 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.36 | 4.24 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.81 | 16.76 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.90 | 54.68 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.00 | 59.09 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...