Ad is loading...
LAFCX vs RMEBX
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$17.91
Change+$0.31 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.53B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.26
Change+$0.76 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. LAFCX (5.54B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMEBX (1.18) vs LAFCX (0.85). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LAFCX (1.45) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. LAFCX (-2.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.21 vs. LAFCX (45.70).
| LAFCX | RMEBX | LAFCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.07 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.07 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.078 | -2.724 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.54B | 95.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.18 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.98 | 1.74 | -171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.06 | 5.82 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.70 | 52.21 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.40 | 53.41 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers