Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMEBX
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.83
Change-$0.04 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.37B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.24
Change-$0.49 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.34B
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFCX (6.37B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMEBX (1.09) vs LAFCX (0.71). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). LAFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.65 vs. RMEBX (5.89). RMEBX (61.00) and LAFCX (59.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFCX | RMEBX | LAFCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.586 | 12.407 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.37B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.09 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | 5.89 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.08 | 39.94 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.60 | 61.00 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.84 | 101.18 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers