Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LASGX vs RERBX
LASGX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts LASGX vs RERBX
Lord Abbett International Growth R4
Price$16.27
Change-$0.06 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.63M
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$58.35
Change-$0.12 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.64B
LASGX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. LASGX (3.63M). RERBX pays higher dividends than LASGX: RERBX (0.25) vs LASGX (0.19). LASGX was incepted earlier than RERBX: LASGX (4 years) vs RERBX (23 years). LASGX (9.37) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). LASGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RERBX (35.00). LASGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERBX: LASGX (0) vs RERBX (250). LASGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.78 vs. RERBX (4.07).
| LASGX | RERBX | LASGX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.56 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 9.37 | 1.56 | 601% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.677 | 14.749 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.63M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.25 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.78 | 4.07 | 314% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.46 | 27.16 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 4.96 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.68 | - |