Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBDRX vs RMEBX
LBDRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBDRX vs RMEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value R
Price$21.66
Change+$0.27 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.05M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.39
Change+$0.59 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.67B
LBDRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBDRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBDRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBDRX (93M). LBDRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LBDRX (1.22) vs RMEBX (1.11). LBDRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBDRX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBDRX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LBDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LBDRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.40 vs. LBDRX (4.27). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.93 vs. LBDRX (33.47).
| LBDRX | RMEBX | LBDRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.07 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 1.07 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.950 | 10.593 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.11 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.27 | 10.40 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.09 | 22.90 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.47 | 53.93 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.89 | 77.74 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement