Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBO vs TAN
LBO vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts LBO vs TAN
LBO vs TAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBO vs. TAN commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBO is a Buy and TAN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 1.29B vs. LBO (7.62M). TAN has a higher annual dividend yield than LBO: TAN (0.407) vs LBO (-4.287). LBO was incepted earlier than TAN: LBO (3 years) vs TAN (18 years). TAN (0.70) has a lower expense ratio than LBO (6.53). TAN has a higher turnover LBO (28.00) vs LBO (28.00).
| LBO | TAN | LBO / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | -4.287 | 0.407 | -1,053% |
| Net Assets | 7.62M | 1.29B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 6.53 | 0.70 | 933% |
| Turnover | 28.00 | 41.00 | 68% |
| Yield | 6.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LBO | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 77% | 20 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IHD | 7.58 | 0.09 | +1.20% |
| VOYA EMERGING MARKETS HIGH Income DIVIDEND EQUITY FUND | |||
| BRIE | 31.26 | 0.37 | +1.20% |
| MFS Blended Research Intl Eq ETF | |||
| SHPP | 35.70 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | |||
| PBAP | 31.42 | N/A | -0.02% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Apr | |||
| SMTH | 25.27 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF | |||
LBO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LBO and RPC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LBO and RPC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBO | 100% | N/A | ||
| RPC - LBO | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.51% | ||
| BBDC - LBO | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
| PFLT - LBO | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PNNT - LBO | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
| GCMG - LBO | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.93% | ||
More | ||||
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been loosely correlated with BEEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then BEEM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | -0.82% | ||
| BEEM - TAN | 49% Loosely correlated | +15.44% | ||
| FAST - TAN | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
| JKS - TAN | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
| DQ - TAN | 9% Poorly correlated | -9.35% | ||
More | ||||