Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMEBX
LBSAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$36.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.24B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.89
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
LBSAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBSAX (44.2B). LBSAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LBSAX (1.42) vs RMEBX (1.11). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBSAX (23 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LBSAX (0.90). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSAX (16.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMEBX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). LBSAX (6.92) and RMEBX (6.81) have marching annual gain over last year. LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.68 vs. RMEBX (53.09).
| LBSAX | RMEBX | LBSAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.07 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.07 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.208 | 11.509 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.2B | 109B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.11 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.92 | 6.81 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.36 | 28.69 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.68 | 53.09 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.33 | 89.52 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers