Ad is loading...
LBSAX vs RMEBX
LBSAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$33.92
Change+$0.19 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.08
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.85B
LBSAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. LBSAX (42.4B). RMEBX (1.54) and LBSAX (1.51) have matching dividends . LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBSAX (22 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LBSAX (17.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMEBX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). LBSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.91 vs. RMEBX (12.29). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.17 vs. RMEBX (36.84).
| LBSAX | RMEBX | LBSAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.881 | 2.149 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 103B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.54 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.91 | 12.29 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.81 | 12.11 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.17 | 36.84 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.97 | 63.72 | 152% |