Ad is loading...
LBSAX vs RMEBX
LBSAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$34.51
Change-$0.33 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.16B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.54
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
LBSAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. LBSAX (43.2B). RMEBX (1.54) and LBSAX (1.51) have matching dividends . LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBSAX (22 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LBSAX (17.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMEBX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.88 vs. LBSAX (10.10). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.58 vs. RMEBX (40.75).
| LBSAX | RMEBX | LBSAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.671 | 4.809 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.2B | 105B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.54 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.10 | 10.88 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.06 | 19.18 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.58 | 40.75 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.91 | 63.29 | 150% |