Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBSAX vs RMEBX
LBSAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBSAX vs RMEBX
Columbia Dividend Income A
Price$36.73
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.52B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.57
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
LBSAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBSAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBSAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LBSAX (45.5B). LBSAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LBSAX (1.37) vs RMEBX (1.05). LBSAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBSAX (23 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LBSAX (0.90). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. LBSAX (16.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBSAX: RMEBX (250) vs LBSAX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. LBSAX (7.29). LBSAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.09 vs. RMEBX (57.72).
| LBSAX | RMEBX | LBSAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.07 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.07 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.783 | 14.848 | 86% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5B | 113B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.05 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.29 | 7.71 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.59 | 43.29 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.09 | 57.72 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.65 | 92.43 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement