LBTYA vs UCL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBTYA is a Buy and UCL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LBTYA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUCL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LBTYA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UCL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LBTYA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LBTYA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
- UCL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LBTYA (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -14.80% price change this week, while UCL (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +4.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
LBTYA is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
UCL is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wireless Telecommunications (+0.73% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| LBTYA | UCL | LBTYA / UCL | |
| Capitalization | 6.41B | 58.9M | 10,878% |
| EBITDA | -501.1M | 3.5M | -14,325% |
| Gain YTD | -27.351 | -42.857 | 64% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.39 | 15.00 | 96% |
| Revenue | 7.49B | 83.5M | 8,971% |
| Total Cash | 3.41B | 27.2M | 12,522% |
| Total Debt | 17.4B | 4.25M | 409,219% |
LBTYA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LBTYA | UCL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 5 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 89% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VFLO | 33.51 | 0.45 | +1.37% |
| VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF | |||
| DBEZ | 51.35 | 0.27 | +0.54% |
| Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Eq ETF | |||
| IBHH | 23.19 | -0.06 | -0.26% |
| iShares iBonds 2028 Term HY & Inc ETF | |||
| FSBD | 46.62 | -0.14 | -0.29% |
| Fidelity Sustainable Core Plus Bond ETF | |||
| IHF | 50.04 | -0.32 | -0.64% |
| iShares US Healthcare Providers ETF | |||
LBTYA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBTYA has been closely correlated with LBTYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBTYA jumps, then LBTYK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBTYA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBTYA | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| LBTYK - LBTYA | 97% Closely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| IDCC - LBTYA | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| S - LBTYA | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| LBTYB - LBTYA | 38% Loosely correlated | +3.70% | ||
| VOD - LBTYA | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
More | ||||
UCL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UCL and LUMN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UCL and LUMN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UCL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCL | 100% | +2.57% | ||
| LUMN - UCL | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.65% | ||
| RCI - UCL | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| TV - UCL | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| LBTYA - UCL | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| TU - UCL | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
More | ||||