LBTYA vs UCL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBTYA is a Hold and UCL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LBTYA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUCL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LBTYA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UCL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LBTYA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LBTYA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- UCL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LBTYA (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -1.68% price change this week, while UCL (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +5.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +10.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
LBTYA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
UCL is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wireless Telecommunications (+10.76% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| LBTYA | UCL | LBTYA / UCL | |
| Capitalization | 6.41B | 58.9M | 10,878% |
| EBITDA | -501.1M | 3.5M | -14,325% |
| Gain YTD | -8.386 | -26.190 | 32% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.39 | 15.00 | 96% |
| Revenue | 7.49B | 83.5M | 8,971% |
| Total Cash | 3.41B | 27.2M | 12,522% |
| Total Debt | 17.4B | 4.25M | 409,219% |
LBTYA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LBTYA | UCL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 70% | 12 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 64% | 12 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 64% | 12 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 66% | 12 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 59% | 24 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 68% | 12 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 62% | 12 days ago 85% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PIZ | 36.88 | 0.23 | +0.63% |
| Invesco DW Developed Markets Momt ETF | |||
| VUSB | 49.71 | N/A | N/A |
| Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF | |||
| ERET | 25.16 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Environmentally Aware Rl Est ETF | |||
| IEO | 99.12 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
| iShares US Oil & Gas Explor & Prod ETF | |||
| SARK | 37.38 | -1.11 | -2.88% |
| Tradr 2X Short Innovation Daily ETF | |||
LBTYA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBTYA has been closely correlated with LBTYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 98% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBTYA jumps, then LBTYK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBTYA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBTYA | 100% | N/A | ||
| LBTYK - LBTYA | 98% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| IDCC - LBTYA | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| KT - LBTYA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| S - LBTYA | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| RCI - LBTYA | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
More | ||||
UCL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UCL and LUMN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UCL and LUMN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UCL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCL | 100% | +15.67% | ||
| LUMN - UCL | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.35% | ||
| RCI - UCL | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
| TV - UCL | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.58% | ||
| LBTYA - UCL | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TU - UCL | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.58% | ||
More | ||||