Advertisement
LBTYA vs UCL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBTYA is a Hold and UCL is a Hold.
| LBTYA | UCL | LBTYA / UCL | |
| Capitalization | 3.55B | 16.3M | 21,798% |
| EBITDA | -1.25B | 1.31M | -96,123% |
| Gain YTD | -6.014 | -74.384 | 8% |
| P/E Ratio | 2.00 | 4.90 | 41% |
| Revenue | 4.89B | 78.4M | 6,231% |
| Total Cash | 2.42B | 37.4M | 6,468% |
| Total Debt | 9.07B | 13.8M | 65,754% |
LBTYA | UCL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 1 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 95 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LBTYA's Valuation (52) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as UCL (57) in the null industry. This means that LBTYA’s stock grew similarly to UCL’s over the last 12 months.
LBTYA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as UCL (100) in the null industry. This means that LBTYA’s stock grew similarly to UCL’s over the last 12 months.
UCL's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as LBTYA (96) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that UCL’s stock grew similarly to LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.
LBTYA's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCL (95) in the null industry. This means that LBTYA’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCL’s over the last 12 months.
LBTYA's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCL (99) in the null industry. This means that LBTYA’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCL’s over the last 12 months.
| LBTYA | UCL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 71% | 13 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LBTYA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while UCL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LBTYA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UCL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LBTYA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LBTYA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UCL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
LBTYA (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -1.41% price change this week, while UCL (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
LBTYA is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
UCL is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (-0.32% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
Advertisement
LBTYA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBTYA has been closely correlated with LBTYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBTYA jumps, then LBTYK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBTYA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBTYA | 100% | -1.41% | ||
| LBTYK - LBTYA | 97% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| IDCC - LBTYA | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| S - LBTYA | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| LILAK - LBTYA | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| LILA - LBTYA | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.26% | ||
More | ||||
UCL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that UCL and LUMN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UCL and LUMN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UCL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCL | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| LUMN - UCL | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.91% | ||
| PCLA - UCL | 22% Poorly correlated | +4.01% | ||
| RCI - UCL | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TV - UCL | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
| LBTYA - UCL | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||