TV
Price
$2.70
Change
-$0.03 (-1.10%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.43B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UCL
Price
$0.96
Change
-$0.05 (-4.95%)
Updated
Jun 23, 01:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
36.57M
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

TV vs UCL

TV vs UCL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
TV vs. UCL commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TV is a StrongBuy and UCL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (TV: $2.73 vs. UCL: $1.01)
Brand notoriety: TV and UCL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: TV: 88% vs. UCL: 30%
Market capitalization -- TV: $1.44B vs. UCL: $38.47M
TV [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $1.44B. UCL’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $38.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $217.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $18.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

TV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUCL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • TV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UCL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TV is a better buy in the long-term than UCL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • TV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UCL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UCL is a better buy in the short-term than TV.

Price Growth

TV (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -6.83% price change this week, while UCL (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -3.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

TV is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

UCL is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-3.99% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TV($1.43B) has a higher market cap than UCL($36.6M). UCL has higher P/E ratio than TV: UCL (10.10) vs TV (0.05). TV YTD gains are higher at: -6.186 vs. UCL (-38.415). TV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24B vs. UCL (5.04M). TV has more cash in the bank: 34.7B vs. UCL (45.8M). UCL has less debt than TV: UCL (9.23M) vs TV (88.6B). TV has higher revenues than UCL: TV (58.4B) vs UCL (79.6M).
TVUCLTV / UCL
Capitalization1.43B36.6M3,902%
EBITDA24B5.04M476,663%
Gain YTD-6.186-38.41516%
P/E Ratio0.0510.101%
Revenue58.4B79.6M73,367%
Total Cash34.7B45.8M75,764%
Total Debt88.6B9.23M959,705%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TV vs UCL: Fundamental Ratings
TV
UCL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
163
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9459
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4864
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9794
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UCL's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as TV (94) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that UCL’s stock grew similarly to TV’s over the last 12 months.

UCL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TV (100) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that UCL’s stock grew similarly to TV’s over the last 12 months.

UCL's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TV (94) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that UCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than TV’s over the last 12 months.

TV's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as UCL (64) in the null industry. This means that TV’s stock grew similarly to UCL’s over the last 12 months.

UCL's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as TV (97) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that UCL’s stock grew similarly to TV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TVUCL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UCL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MU1211.3877.39
+6.82%
Micron Technology
SSL11.290.52
+4.83%
Sasol Limited
CBL49.602.20
+4.64%
CBL & Associates Properties
RCT0.630.01
+2.09%
RedCloud Holdings PLC
VACI10.21-0.01
-0.10%
Viking Acquisition Corp.

TV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TV has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TV jumps, then S could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TV
1D Price
Change %
TV100%
-8.70%
S - TV
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
ASTS - TV
29%
Poorly correlated
-9.26%
PHI - TV
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
IDCC - TV
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
CHTR - TV
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
More

UCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UCL and LUMN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UCL and LUMN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UCL
1D Price
Change %
UCL100%
-4.90%
LUMN - UCL
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
RCI - UCL
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.51%
TV - UCL
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.70%
LBTYA - UCL
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
TU - UCL
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.73%
More