Ad is loading...
LCBSX vs PEMGX
LCBSX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LCBSX vs PEMGX
LCBSX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBSX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBSX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 29.8B vs. LCBSX (3.68B). LCBSX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCBSX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LCBSX (12 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. PEMGX (10.10). LCBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PEMGX: LCBSX (0) vs PEMGX (1000). LCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.15 vs. PEMGX (18.56). LCBSX return over 5 years is better than : 82.12 vs. PEMGX (40.20).
| LCBSX | PEMGX | LCBSX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.813 | 3.426 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.68B | 29.8B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.15 | 18.56 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.84 | 24.41 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.12 | 40.20 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 260.36 | 105.40 | 247% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...