Ad is loading...
LCBSX vs PEMGX
LCBSX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LCBSX vs PEMGX
LCBSX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBSX vs. PEMGX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBSX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 29.8B vs. LCBSX (3.25B). LCBSX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCBSX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LCBSX (12 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). LCBSX (1.37) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.95). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). LCBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PEMGX: LCBSX (0) vs PEMGX (1000). PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.33 vs. LCBSX (5.37). LCBSX return over 5 years is better than : 126.48 vs. PEMGX (101.64).
| LCBSX | PEMGX | LCBSX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.95 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.95 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.253 | 1.009 | -719% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.25B | 29.8B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.37 | 7.33 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.60 | 19.09 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 126.48 | 101.64 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 214.44 | 86.08 | 249% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...