Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBSX vs PEMGX
LCBSX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LCBSX vs PEMGX
LCBSX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBSX vs. PEMGX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBSX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 30.6B vs. LCBSX (3.37B). LCBSX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCBSX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LCBSX (13 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). LCBSX (1.37) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). LCBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PEMGX: LCBSX (0) vs PEMGX (1000). LCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.13 vs. PEMGX (-8.77). LCBSX return over 5 years is better than : 26.77 vs. PEMGX (24.74).
| LCBSX | PEMGX | LCBSX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.91 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.91 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.730 | -1.337 | -129% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.37B | 30.6B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.13 | -8.77 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.13 | 29.98 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.77 | 24.74 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 246.86 | 88.16 | 280% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement