Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBSX vs PEMGX
LCBSX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LCBSX vs PEMGX
LCBSX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBSX vs. PEMGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBSX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.3B vs. LCBSX (3.08B). LCBSX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCBSX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LCBSX (14 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). LCBSX (1.37) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). LCBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PEMGX: LCBSX (0) vs PEMGX (1000). LCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.38 vs. PEMGX (-19.11). LCBSX return over 5 years is better than : 5.29 vs. PEMGX (-9.00).
| LCBSX | PEMGX | LCBSX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.90 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.90 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.228 | -8.102 | -27% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.08B | 21.3B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.38 | -19.11 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.93 | 9.32 | 461% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.29 | -9.00 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 292.32 | 71.78 | 407% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers