Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBSX vs PEMGX
LCBSX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LCBSX vs PEMGX
LCBSX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBSX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBSX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. LCBSX (3.3B). LCBSX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCBSX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LCBSX (14 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). LCBSX (1.37) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. PEMGX (13.70). LCBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PEMGX: LCBSX (0) vs PEMGX (1000). LCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.81 vs. PEMGX (-12.72). LCBSX return over 5 years is better than : 9.51 vs. PEMGX (-2.01).
| LCBSX | PEMGX | LCBSX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.90 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.90 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.874 | -3.290 | -148% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.3B | 24.3B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.81 | -12.72 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.73 | 14.14 | 309% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.51 | -2.01 | -472% |
| Returns for 10 years | 336.59 | 84.57 | 398% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement